• Doctor
  • GP practice

Norwood Medical Centre

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

99 Abbey Road, Barrow-In-Furness, Cumbria, LA14 5ES (01229) 402525

Provided and run by:
Norwood Medical Centre

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Norwood Medical Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Norwood Medical Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

17 December 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Norwood Medical Centre on 17 December 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

18 November 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at the Norwood Medical Practice on 18 November 2015. Overall the practice is rated as outstanding.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and report incidents and near misses. All opportunities for learning from internal and external incidents were maximised.
  • The NHS National GP Patient Survey of the practice showed high levels of patient satisfaction with the quality of GP and nurse consultations.
  • Staff were committed to supporting patients to live healthier lives through a targeted and very proactive approach to health promotion.
  • Risks to patients and staff were assessed and well managed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance.
  • The practice was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • All staff were actively engaged in activities to monitor and improve quality and outcomes for patients.
  • Information about how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Very good arrangements had been made to meet the needs of patients who were also carers.
  • Patient feedback about access to the practice and appointments was mixed. Whilst some patients were satisfied with access, the NHS GP Patient Survey results showed lower levels of satisfaction than the local Clinical Commissioning Group and national averages. The practice had taken steps to address this by making changes to their appointment system and how they met patients’ needs.
  • The leadership, governance and culture at the practice were used to drive and improve the delivery of high-quality person-centred care. There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by the management team. Very good governance arrangements were in place.
  • The practice had a clear vision for the development of the practice and safety as its top priority. The strategy and supporting objectives were stretching and challenging, whilst remaining achievable. Staff were committed to providing their patients with good quality care.

We also saw areas of outstanding practice:

  • There were very good arrangements for meeting the needs of patients who required dermatological care and treatment. The senior GP partner acted as a GP with a Special Interest, and had set up a local community dermatology clinic at the practice. 220 patients had received care and treatment at the clinic during 2014/15. All patients, including those not registered with the practice, were seen and treated within three weeks of being referred to the clinic. Of these 514 patients, 53 had been diagnosed with skin cancer and, where relevant, an appropriate referral had been made to specialist services. This is outstanding because the practice is providing an additional service which reduces the burden on hospital services and enables patients to receive care and treatment closer to home.  
  • The practice demonstrated a very caring and responsive approach to patients and their individual needs. They had a dedicated member of staff in a patient liaison adviser (PLA) role, who was available, at all times the practice was open, to offer practical and emotional support to patients, and to advocate on their behalf with other agencies and support groups. On average, the PLA provided assistance to at least two patients every week. This is outstanding because it showed a strong commitment to helping patients who are facing emotional and practical challenges in their lives.
  • Overall, there were very good arrangements for meeting the needs of patients diagnosed with dementia. The practice had designated clinical dementia leads who had worked with the rest of the team to improve their performance regarding the early diagnosis of dementia. Patients identified as being at risk of developing dementia were contacted by telephone and invited to make an appointment for their annual health care review. Where clinical staff had concerns about a patient’s memory, allocated memory clinic appointments were also available at the practice. Clinicians were proactive in caring out dementia screening, where they thought patients were at risk of developing dementia. Several members of staff had completed the ‘Dementia Friends’ training course, to help them provide dementia patients with appropriate care and support.

However, there were also areas where the provider needs to make improvements. The provider should:

  • GPs should carry emergency medicines for use on home visits in acute situations.
  • Continue to review and improve the practice’s telephone access and appointment system.
  • Ensure that the guidance issued by NHS Protect regarding prescription security is followed.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

7 May 2014

During a routine inspection

Norwood Medical Centre provides primary medical care services for patients living in Barrow in Furness, Cumbria. There are 11,200 patients registered at the practice. The practice is open Monday to Friday 8am until 6pm. Provision for early appointments before 8am and after 6pm for patients who work, are available on request.

The practice provides care and treatments in an environment which is clean and well organised. The building is well maintained and fit for purpose.

All patients we spoke with were very satisfied with the standard of care and treatment provided. Patients spoke positively about the attitude of staff; however we received consistent feedback about the difficulty in booking same day appointments. We were told appointments were always available in urgent and emergency cases on the same day. 

Patients said staff were caring and always maintained privacy and dignity. Doctors and nurses explained treatments and choices available. Patients told us they would recommend the practice to family and friends and people new to the area.

Robust monitoring arrangements are in place for the management of medicines. Drug safety alerts are managed appropriately. There is a nominated GP who monitored prescribing, along with the nurse practitioner. There is also an administration lead for prescribing monitoring.

The practice is registered with the Care Quality Commission to deliver the the following regulated activities: Treatment of disease, disorder and injury, surgical procedures, family planning, diagnostic and screening procedures and maternity and midwifery services.