• Doctor
  • GP practice

Dr PM Patel/Dr R Kumar Also known as Suttons Avenue Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

24 Suttons Avenue, Hornchurch, Essex, RM12 4LF (01708) 442711

Provided and run by:
Suttons Avenue Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Dr PM Patel/Dr R Kumar on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Dr PM Patel/Dr R Kumar, you can give feedback on this service.

11 September 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Dr PM Patel/Dr R Kumar on 11 September 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

31 July 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr PM Patel/Dr R Kumar on 3 May 2016. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report on the May 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dr PM Patel/Dr R Kumar on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced comprehensive inspection on 31 July 2017. Overall the practice is now rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients we spoke with said they generally found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider should make improvements.

The provider should:

  • Improve systems and processes to improve the identification of patients who are also carers.

  • Ensure the business continuity plan is updated to include contact details for all staff.

  • Review childhood immunisation achievement rates against local and national averages.

  • Review measures to support access for patients who have a hearing impairment.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

3 May 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr PM Patel and Dr R Kumar on 3 May 2016. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Systems and processes were not in place to keep patients safe. For example; appropriate recruitment checks on staff had not been undertaken prior to their employment; Actions identified to address concerns with infection control practice had not been taken. The practice had not carried out a fire risk assessment, staff had not carried out fire evacuation drills and there were no fire alarms or firefighting equipment and the practice were unaware that the oxygen cylinder was empty.

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting significant events; however learning was not always shared with all relevant members of staff.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.
  • Mandatory training had not been carried out by all non-clinical members of staff, this included safeguarding, fire and infection control training and there were inconsistencies in how training records were kept.
  • Non-clinical staff had not completed an appraisal or personal development plan since 2013.
  • There was no evidence of the patient participation group meeting since March 2015 and the practice could not demonstrate changes that have been made to the practice as a result of the patient participation group.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure equipment used in the treatment used for emergencies are available and in date.

  • Ensure recruitment arrangements include all necessary employment checks for all staff, for example DBS checks or risk assessments and references.

  • Mitigate risks associated with fire, infection control.

  • Provide staff with appropriate training, policies and guidance to carry out their roles in a safe and effective manner which are reflective of the requirements of the practice.

  • Put systems in place to ensure mandatory training is carried out by all members of staff.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Ensure learning and outcomes from significant events, incidents and complaints are shared with all relevant members of the practice.

  • Review arrangements for the patient participation group that would allow for regular meetings and patient input into the services provided.

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice