• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Mrs Saeeda Parwaiz Also known as Ratby Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

122 Station Road, Ratby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE6 0JP (0116) 239 4960

Provided and run by:
Mrs Saeeda Parwaiz

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

12 May 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Ratby Surgery on 12 May 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing, well-led, effective, caring and responsive services. It was also good for providing services for older people; patients with long term conditions; families children and young people; working age people and those recently retired; people experiencing poor mental health and people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. We found the practice to be requiring improvement in safe.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed, with the exception of those relating to recruitment checks.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.

However there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider must;

  • Ensure that the recruitment policy is followed in all and that appropriate recruitment checks For example, proof of identification, references, qualifications, registration with the appropriate professional body and the appropriate checks through the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS).
  • Ensure that all staff receive an annual appraisal and that it is recorded.
  • Ensure that a policy for the management, testing and investigation of legionella is implemented or that a risk assessment has taken place.

Importantly the provider should;

  • All procedures and policies to be reviewed to ensure their relevance and current best practice.
  • Ensure that clinical audits include a second cycle to complete the process.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

14 February 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with six patients and six staff. Patients told us doctors listened to them and respected their views about their own health. One patient told us, 'The doctor helped me with my asthma, and showed me how to use an inhaler. I really appreciated this.' Another patient told us, 'The nurse was very compassionate.' Patients' needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual wishes.

Staff at the practice worked with other safeguarding teams to ensure patients were protected from harm. We found staff were trained and supported to provide care and treatment to patients. One staff member told us the regular lunch time meetings with the doctor helped them keep trained and up to date. All the patients we spoke with confirmed the treatment rooms were clean hygienic and tidy. The practice had systems in place which would enable them to monitor the quality of the service. We saw information about the Patients Participation Group (PPG) displayed on the patient's noticeboard, and a suggestion box in the reception area. This enabled patients to contact the group to give feedback and suggestions.