• Doctor
  • GP practice

Kingswood Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

14 Wetherby Road, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, HG2 7SA (01423) 887733

Provided and run by:
Kingswood Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Kingswood Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Kingswood Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

9 January 2020

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Kingswood Surgery on 9 January 2020. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

14 June 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Kingswood Surgery on 14 June 2017. Overall the practice is rated as good for providing safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led care for all of the population groups it serves.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • The ethos and culture of the practice was to provide a good quality service and care to patients.

  • Patients told us they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in care and decisions about their treatment.

  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance.

  • The practice was able to meet the needs of patients. Information regarding the services provided by the practice and how to make a complaint was readily available for patients.
  • Patients reported they were positive about access to the service. They said they found it generally easy to make an appointment, there was continuity of care and urgent appointments were available on the same day as requested.

  • The practice complied with the requirements of the duty of candour. (The duty of candour is a set of specific legal requirements that providers of services must follow when things go wrong with care and treatment.)

  • The practice had a culture of openness and honesty which was reflected in their approach to safety.

  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.

  • There were comprehensive safeguarding systems in place; particularly around vulnerable children and adults.

  • The practice sought patient views on how improvements could be made to the service, through the use of patient surveys, the NHS Friends and Family Test and the Paient Participation Group (PPG).

  • There was a clear leadership structure, staff were aware of their roles and responsibilities and told us the GPs and manager were accessible and supportive

  • The practice was forward thinking, aware of future challenges and were open to innovative practice.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

The provider should:

  • Continue to make improvements in response to the patient survey results.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

1 December 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Kingswood Surgery on 1 December 2015.

Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. However, when there were unintended or unexpected safety incidents, reviews and investigations were not thorough enough.
  • Some of the systems and processes to address and identify risks to patients and staff were not always in place or implemented well enough to ensure patients were kept safe.
  • There was evidence of appraisals and personal development plans for all staff.
  • Staff worked with multidisciplinary teams to understand and meet the range and complexity of people’s needs. Multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meetings took place and the practice was involved in a number of specific MDT initiatives to improve outcomes for patients.
  • Data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) for 2014/2015 was below the local CCG and national averages. (QOF is a system intended to improve the quality of general practice and reward good practice). We saw evidence that new systems had been put in place to address this and patients were now being systematically recalled and reviewed.
  • The practice could not demonstrate how they ensured mandatory and role-specific training was completed for relevant staff.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey in respect of patients being treated with compassion, dignity and respect and being involved in care planning was below the CCG and national averages. However, we received mostly positive feedback from patients and CQC comment cards.
  • The practice reviewed the needs of its local population and engaged with the NHS England Area Team and Clinical Commissioning Group to secure improvements to services where these were identified.
  • The practice offered a wide range of appointments outside of core appointment times.
  • Whilst data and some feedback from patients showed that access to appointments was lengthy the practice demonstrated they kept this under review and were trialling new initiatives to improve patient satisfaction. Urgent appointments were available daily with the duty doctor.
  • Staff told us they felt supported by the GP partners and made particular reference to the excellent level of support and direction provided by the interim practice manager.
  • The practice did not have a business plan in place which was subsequently not monitored or regularly reviewed. The practice had experienced staffing challenges in the last year and demonstrated they were on an improvement trajectory in some areas.
  • The practice had an overarching governance framework but this was not always effective. Arrangements for identifying, recording and managing risks, issues and implementing mitigating actions were not always effective or timely.

There were also areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

The areas where the provider must make improvement are:

  • All employed persons providing care or treatment to patients must have the qualifications, competence, skills and experience to do so safely. Specifically, this includes ensuring staff training is up to date and the relevant staff are competency assessed and records kept in individual staff files.
  • The practice must always assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of patients and others who may be put at risk which arises from the carrying on of the regulated activity.
  • There must be systems for assessing the risk of preventing, detecting and controlling the spread of infections. Specifically, ensure that staff are trained and documented audits are carried out in respect of the management of infection control.
  • The practice must take action to ensure recruitment arrangements are in line with Schedule 3 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 to ensure necessary employment checks are in place for all staff. Specifically, this includes completing Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks for those staff that need them.
  • The practice must ensure that systems for good governance are in place to assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of patients and staff are effective.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Ensure access to routine appointments is kept under review so that routine appointments can be accessed in a timely way
  • Ensure the practice provides care and treatment in a safe way by ensuring that patients are reviewed in a timely way.
  • Ensure the practice records actions from clinical meetings.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice