• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Dr Emad Gabrawi Also known as Crookes Valley Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1 Barber Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 1EA 0845 122 2023

Provided and run by:
Dr Emad Gabrawi

All Inspections

Desk top review performed 30 September 2016

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of this practice on 12 May 2015. Breaches of legal requirements were found. After the comprehensive inspection, the practice wrote to us to say what they would do to meet legal requirements in relation to the regulatory breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) 2014 Regulation 15 Premises and equipment. We undertook a desk top review on 30 September 2016 to check that they had followed their plan and to confirm that they now met the legal requirements.

This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Dr Emad Gabrawi on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Overall the practice is rated as Good. Specifically, following the focused desk top inspection we found the practice to be good for providing safe services. Our key findings across all the areas we reviewed were as follows:

  • A fire risk assessment was  completed in September 2015  and an infection prevention and control audit was completed in June 2015. The practice documented and shared with us  actions taken in accord with the findings.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

12 May 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Emad Gabrawi’s practice on 12 May 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing well-led, effective, caring and responsive services. It was also good for providing services for all the population groups. It required improvement for providing safe services.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance.
  • Risks to patients were not always assessed and well managed. The practice had not completed an infection prevention control audit or fire assessment within the last 12 months.
  • Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients’ said they found it easy to make an appointment and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice actively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

However there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider must:

  • Ensure an infection control audit is completed and action plan implemented in accordance with the findings.
  • Ensure a fire assessment of the premises is completed and action plan implemented in accordance with the findings.

In addition the provider should:

  • Risk assess and review the absence of oxygen and a defibrillator on the premises to ensure the safety and welfare of patients.
  • Ensure recruitment arrangements include all necessary employment checks for all staff.
  • Review the provision of curtains in the GP consulting room.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

12 November 2013

During a routine inspection

Patients expressed their views and were involved in making decisions about their care and treatment. People's diversity, values and human rights were respected. Patients told us they felt they could speak to staff in confidence and felt valued as an individual.

Care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare. The people we spoke with were complimentary about the treatment they received. One patient told us, 'The staff are wonderful' and another patient said, 'Here, everything is perfect.'

People were protected from the risk of infection because appropriate guidance had been followed. Patients told us they thought the practice was clean enough.

Staff received appropriate professional development. Staff said they were well supported and it was a friendly and happy team to work in.

The provider had an effective system to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that patients received.