We carried out a review of the data available to us about Firtree House Nursing Home on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Firtree House Nursing Home, you can give feedback on this service.
We found the following examples of good practice.
The premises were clean and well maintained. Additional cleaning schedules had been introduced since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. High touch areas such as door handles and light switches were cleaned throughout the day by a dedicated team of cleaners.
There were posters on display at the entrance to the home, informing visitors of expectations in line with current government guidance. Hand sanitiser and wipes was readily available in all parts of the home.
Clinical waste was safely disposed of and staff had ready access personal protective equipment (PPE). People’s clothes and bed linen were washed separately to prevent cross-contamination.
Visiting was in line with government guidance. People were supported by staff to see their family members in a COVID-safe way, which included producing evidence of a recent negative COVID-19 test before entering the building through a separate entrance.
All staff had received recent training in infection prevention and control (IPC) and were seen to be following correct IPC practices at all times. The registered manager was accepting of all advice and guidance offered by external agencies including the local CCG, Surrey County Council and CQC. There were two designated IPC leads who shared all current government policy updates with staff and family members.
The registered manager and senior leadership team supported staff to provide people with good day to day care. The provider maintained a testing programme in line with current government guidance for both staff and visitors to the service.
The care service has been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen. At the time of our visit 25 people lived at the home.
The home was previously registered under a different provider and was rated Requires Improvement. A new provider has taken over the service and registered the home with the CQC. We carried out this inspection to ensure the new provider had taken action to address the issues at the home, and that people were receiving a good standard of care. Feedback from service commissioners was that the service had greatly improved under the new management.
This was the first inspection of Firtree House Nursing Home under the new provider. This inspection took place on 31 May 2018 and was unannounced. During this inspection we found that the concerns identified at our previous inspection under the previous provider had been dealt with.
There were two registered managers in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager was at the home during the time of our inspection.
People were very positive about the new management. The described how real changes had been made to their lives and they were much happier and satisfied with the care they received. People were complimentary about the staff, describing them as caring and happy in their work.
People were safe at Firtree House Nursing Home. Risks around people’s health and safety had been identified and clear plans and guidelines were in place to minimise these risks. Staff understood their duty should they suspect abuse was taking place, to keep people safe.
There were sufficient staff deployed to meet the needs of the people who lived at the home. Under the previous provider the majority of staff had been agency. NHS NRS Healthcare Limited, the new provider, had stopped this, and the home was now fully staffed by permanent carers and nurses. The provider had carried out appropriate recruitment checks to ensure staff were suitable to support people in the home. Staff received an induction when they started working at the home and had ongoing training. This was tailored to the needs of the people they supported, and also gave the nursing staff the training and clinical supervision to keep their registration with the Nursing and Midwifery Council up to date.
Staff managed the medicines in a safe way and were trained in the safe administration of medicines. The home was clean and staff practiced good infection control measures, such as hand washing, hygienic cleaning of the environment and equipment and correct use of personal protective equipment.
In the event of an emergency people would be protected because there were clear procedures in place to evacuate the building. Accidents and incidents were reviewed to minimise the risk of them happening again.
Before people moved into the home, their needs were assessed to ensure staff could provide the care and support they needed. People told us they enjoyed the food. They received a balanced diet and they were encouraged to keep hydrated. People had enough to eat and drink, and specialist diets either through medical requirements, or personal choices were provided.
People were supported to maintain good health as they had access to relevant healthcare professionals when they needed them. People’s health was seen to improve because of the effective care and support given by staff. Staff worked with local health authorities on initiatives to continue to improve the care people received.
Where people did not have the capacity to understand or consent to a decision the provider had followed the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (2005). An appropriate assessment of people’s ability to make decisions for themselves had been completed. Where people’s liberty may be restricted to keep them safe, the provider had followed the requirements of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) to ensure the person’s rights were protected.
People knew how to make a complaint. No complaints had been received since the new providers had taken over the service.
People received the care and support as detailed in their care plans. People had access to a range of activities. These helped stimulate people’s minds to prevent them from becoming bored or isolated.
The staff knew the people they cared for as individuals, and were positive in their interactions with them. Staff treated people with kindness and respect. People were involved in their day to day care decisions. People would be supported at the end of their lives to have a dignified death.
The registered managers had a clear vision and set of values based on providing personalised care to people. Staff understood this and demonstrated these values during the inspection in their interactions with people. Quality assurance processes were used to make improvements to the home and the experience of people who live here.
The new provider had taken ownership of the troubles from the previous owners and really made improvements to the care people received. They had a clear plan to continue the improvement process throughout the home so that people received a standard of care they had never received before. Improvements to the way staff are supported and involved in the home has also had a positive impact on people’s experience.