You are here

European Nursing Agency Limited Good

This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Reports


Inspection carried out on 20 February 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 22 and 23 February and 6 March 2017. This was an announced inspection where we gave the provider 48 hours' notice because we needed to ensure someone would be available to assist us with the inspection.

We brought forward this inspection due to concerns raised with us. These concerns were about the recruitment and support of staff and the lack of reporting to the commission of safeguarding. However, we found the provider had acted on the concerns raised and clarified recruitment and support of staff as well as procedures around reporting safeguarding.

European Nursing Agency (ENA) provides live-in personal care and support to people, some of whom have complex physical needs, in their own homes as well as providing hourly personal care day visits. At the time of the inspection European Nursing Agency was supporting 106 people.

The service had a manager who was registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. In this instance the registered manager was also the provider.

We found further developments were needed in the assessments for activities or areas that could pose a risk to people as they were not always detailed or contained sufficient information to inform staff how to manage situations. However, staff were clear on their role and how to keep people safe.

Whilst we found there were systems in place to review the quality of the service, these were not always consistent as some of the care plans had not been reviewed and contained information that was out of date.

People told us they felt safe and were confident in staff abilities to support them. Staff were trained and supported to deliver good care. Safe and effective recruitment practices were followed to ensure that all staff were suitably qualified and experienced. There were sufficient staff with a on call team of care staff to cover emergencies.

People received care that was personalised to their needs. They were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible.

People were treated with dignity and respect and were involved in planning their care.

The registered manager and staff promoted an open inclusive culture focused on providing a personalised service for each person. However, systems in place to monitor the quality of the service were not always consistent.

Inspection carried out on 13 April 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 22 and 23 February and 6 March 2017. This was an announced inspection where we gave the provider 48 hours' notice because we needed to ensure someone would be available to assist us with the inspection.

We brought forward this inspection due to concerns raised with us. These concerns were about the recruitment and support of staff and the lack of reporting to the commission of safeguarding. However, we found the provider had acted on the concerns raised and clarified recruitment and support of staff as well as procedures around reporting safeguarding.

European Nursing Agency (ENA) provides live-in personal care and support to people, some of whom have complex physical needs, in their own homes as well as providing hourly personal care day visits. At the time of the inspection European Nursing Agency was supporting 106 people.

The service had a manager who was registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. In this instance the registered manager was also the provider.

We found further developments were needed in the assessments for activities or areas that could pose a risk to people as they were not always detailed or contained sufficient information to inform staff how to manage situations. However, staff were clear on their role and how to keep people safe.

Whilst we found there were systems in place to review the quality of the service, these were not always consistent as some of the care plans had not been reviewed and contained information that was out of date.

People told us they felt safe and were confident in staff abilities to support them. Staff were trained and supported to deliver good care. Safe and effective recruitment practices were followed to ensure that all staff were suitably qualified and experienced. There were sufficient staff with a on call team of care staff to cover emergencies.

People received care that was personalised to their needs. They were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible.

People were treated with dignity and respect and were involved in planning their care.

The registered manager and staff promoted an open inclusive culture focused on providing a personalised service for each person. However, systems in place to monitor the quality of the service were not always consistent.

Inspection carried out on 13, 19 June 2013

During a routine inspection

During our inspection we visited the agency's office and the homes of two people who used the service on 13 June 2013. On 19 June 2013 we spoke to 14 people who used the service and five care workers on the telephone. People told us that they and their relatives had been involved in the discussions as to the care that they needed and were involved in regular reviews of their needs with their care co-ordinator. One person told us that their care co-ordinator "...checks if everything is okay or if anything wants to change." People told us that the care workers treated them with dignity and respect at all times.

People told us that they were happy with the quality of the care that was provided. One person told us, "They are excellent." We saw that people's care plans were very detailed and personalised and were supported by detailed assessments that identified possible risks to people, such as moving and handling and nutrition.

We spoke with seven care workers who were able to demonstrate that they had a good understanding of what constituted abuse and the procedure for reporting safeguarding issues. Records showed that new staff members had started work only after a full and satisfactory criminal records check had been received.

People we spoke with told us that they were very satisfied with the quality of the care provided by the service. They said that they had regular visits from their care co-ordinators who discussed the quality of the service provided.