• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Esteem Homecare Services

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

3-4 Prospect Park, Easingwold, North Yorkshire, YO61 3HL (01347) 821224

Provided and run by:
Esteem Homecare Services

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

7 July 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection was carried out on 7July 2015. At our previous inspection on 23 September 2013 the provider was meeting the regulations that were assessed.

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Esteem Homecare Services provides domiciliary care and support in Easingwold, Thirsk, Northallerton, Bedale and the surrounding areas. It operates from an office located in Easingwold.

At the time of our inspection there were 34 people who received a service from the agency.

People who received care and support from the agency provided us with positive feedback. They said they received a reliable service and a good standard of support from caring, kind and compassionate staff. People told us they felt safe in the way staff supported them and had confidence in the staff.

Care and support was provided to people in their own home on a flexible basis and in accordance with individual needs. Risks to people’s safety and welfare had been assessed and information about how to support people to manage risks was recorded in people's care plan.

Staff had a good understanding of how to identify abuse, and knew how to respond appropriately to any concerns to keep people safe.

Recruitment procedures were in place to ensure that only people who were deemed suitable worked within the service. There was an induction programme for new staff which prepared them for their role. Staff were provided with a range of training to help them to carry out their roles effectively. They had regular supervision meetings with their manager and annual appraisals to support them to meet people’s needs. There were enough staff employed by the service to meet people’s needs.

People had care plans in place which reflected their assessed needs. People were supported effectively with their health needs and were involved in making decisions about what kind of support they wanted.

Staff treated people with kindness and compassion and cared for them according to their individual needs. Staff had a good understanding of people’s needs and preferences and we received positive feedback from relatives about the service provided by care workers.

People using the service, relatives and staff were encouraged to give feedback on the service. They knew how to make complaints and there was an effective complaints management system in place.

The service carried out regular audits to monitor the quality of the service and to plan improvements. Where issues were identified action plans were put in place to rectify these.

23 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with the provider, people receiving services, relatives and members of the care team on the day of our inspection.

We spoke with four people who used the service and two people's relatives. They told us they had agreed to the care package provided. They also said they were respected and supported by the care staff. Comments included: 'I couldn't do without their help and support.' And 'They (the carers) go more than the extra mile, they are wonderful.' Another said 'They (the carers) always have time for us.'

People we spoke with told us they had their care reviewed regularly. They said that they were consulted and felt part of the decision making regarding their care and welfare.

People we spoke with told us that they felt safe when any of the team members were with them. One person commented 'I am happy with all of the carers, they know me and I know them.'

People told us they thought most of the carers were knowledgeable when caring for them.

We saw that the provider had some systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service provided.

30 October 2012

During a routine inspection

People said that they were generally satisfied with the care they received and did not raise any serious concerns. Some people spoke very highly about the standard of care they experienced. Other people felt that the standard sometimes varied and that there could be more consistency. Comments made by people who use the service included 'the care itself is absolutely marvellous, the hands on care' and 'on the whole I can't rave about them, but I certainly can't complain too much about them'. Comments about the staff and their approach included 'she's (the manager) a qualified nurse', 'the girls were all brilliant', 'they were really good with him (person who uses services)' and 'they seem to have a good rapport'.

Staff told us that they had gone through a recruitment procedure which included criminal records bureau checks, providing references and attending an interview. They also confirmed that they had received training in safeguarding adults and were able to demonstrate a good knowledge of abuse and reporting procedures.

Although we have found the provider to be compliant overall, we have suggested minor improvements in some areas. For example, some of the information provided about the service, the consistency of risk assessments and care planning, the recording of any issues identified during staff recruitment and how complaints and concerns are recorded.