1, 2 July 2013
During a routine inspection
People using the service felt listened to and reported that they were treated with respect and had their dignity maintained.
People told us the staff turned up on time and 'did what they were meant to'. People had individual support plans which outlined the support to be provided, at what time and how long for. However, people told us that often the staff were rushed and they would benefit from longer appointment times especially over meal times.
There were effective selection and recruitment processes in place, and appropriate checks were undertaken before staff started work.
Staff spoken with told us they felt well supported by the manager of the service. They told us the manager was available over the phone and if needed came to the house of the person using the service to provide further support. Supervision was provided every three months.
There were processes in place for checking the quality of the service provided and people using the service told us the manager came to their home to get their views on the service provided. However, we found that not all these spot checks were formalised and recorded. Therefore we were unable to identify if any concerns had been raised or how they were dealt with.