We carried out a review of the data available to us about Caring Partnership Ltd on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Caring Partnership Ltd, you can give feedback on this service.
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes in the community. At the time of this inspection the service was supporting 63 people. Not everyone using the service receives regulated activity; the Care Quality Commission (CQC)only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also take into account any wider social care provided.
There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
The registered manager told us not everyone who received a service had the capacity to make decisions about their care and support. They said people did not always have mental capacity assessments or best interest decisions in their care plans. The registered manager said some ‘as required’ protocols were not in place and although, MARs and daily log books were audited, actions were not always recorded. The registered manager told us they would be addressing these issues immediately. The operations manager told us they were in the process of looking to introduce a more robust audit system.
People told us they were very happy with the service, felt safe and staff were kind and caring, treated them with dignity and respected their choices. There were procedures in place to protect people from risk of harm and individual risks had been assessed and measures had been identified to reduce the risk. Staff we spoke with understood the signs to look for which may indicate potential abuse. Staff told us they always had sufficient gloves and apron for providing personal care.
Robust recruitment procedures were in place and staffing levels we suitable to meet people’s identified needs. People who used the service said staff always stayed the agreed length of time and were more or less always on time. Staff attended supervision and completed appropriate training.
Individual needs were assessed and care plans identified how care and support should be delivered, people’s routines and preferred preferences. Staff members told us care plans contained sufficient information to enable them to carry out their role effectively. People received assistance with meals and healthcare when required. The service provided support for people who were approaching the end of their life with support from the relevant district nursing team. Staff had received training and there were policies and procedures in place for staff to follow for the safe handling of medicines.
People and staff told us the management of the service was very good. Mechanisms were in place to obtain feedback on the service from people who used the service, family members and staff, including questionnaires, observations of staff practice and meetings. Complaints were appropriately managed.