• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Community Integrated Care, Leeds Regional Office Also known as Community Integrated Care, Leeds Regional Office 1-375048736

Unit 25, Evans Business Centre, Burley Hill Trading Estate, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS4 2PU (0113) 288 3292

Provided and run by:
Community Integrated Care

All Inspections

01/04/2014

During a routine inspection

Leeds Regional Office provides 24 hour personal care and support to people living in their own homes. The Regional Office provides support for people who have a learning disability living in 12 separate houses.

At the time of our inspection the service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service and shares the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law with the provider.

Over the past 12 months the service has changed from providing residential services to a supported living service. The manager told us a lot of changes had taken place which included some staff turnover. However, they believed that people who used the service had benefited from the changes.

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our observations during the inspection from looking at records and from speaking with people who used the service in their own homes, relatives, and staff.

People told us they were happy living in their own home and they felt safe. People who used the service and their families had contributed their opinions and preferences in relation to how support was delivered. We found that people were involved in most decisions about the care and support they received. We spoke with staff and saw they understood people’s care and support needs.

People told us they received the care and support they needed. They had been encouraged to make their views known about their care. They had contributed to their assessments and support plans, about how they should be given care and support. People’s support plans had a level of information about how each person should be supported.

We were told people’s privacy and dignity was respected when staff supported people with their personal support needs.

We found people were cared for, or supported by, sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, skilled and experienced staff. Staff had a programme of training, supervision and appraisal. Robust recruitment and selection procedures were in place and appropriate checks had been undertaken before staff began work.

People were supported to maintain good health and have access to healthcare services. The service worked effectively with healthcare professionals and was pro-active in referring people for treatment and diagnosis.

The manager told us they were confident that all the staff had a good understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Everyone we spoke to who used the service said they would be confident to make a complaint, should this be required. Staff members told us that they would support people if they wanted to complain. We found the service learnt from any complaints made and investigations were thorough and objective.

The provider had systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service, people had a chance to say what they thought about the service and the feedback gave the provider an opportunity for learning or improvement.

The service promoted a positive culture that was inclusive and empowering. People spoke positively about the approach of staff and the manager. Staff were aware of their roles and responsibilities.

29, 30 August 2013

During a routine inspection

We inspected the head office and three supported living homes in Leeds. We looked at four care plans, six staff files and talked with eight staff and four people who used the service.

People's needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual care plan. Care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare. People were supported to make decisions about their care. If a person did not have capacity to provide consent a 'best interests' meeting was held.

We looked the staff records and we spoke with the provider. We looked at the recruitment procedure for the service. We found that appropriate checks were undertaken before staff began work and there were effective recruitment and selection processes in place to ensure that people who used the service were kept safe.

People were supported and assisted with the cleanliness of their home.

People were given support by the provider to make a comment or complaint where they needed assistance. People's complaints were fully investigated and resolved, where possible, to their satisfaction.

People told us they liked the staff. One person told us "They had lots of things to do and I like to go to the pub for a drink." We observed a person who used the service choosing a film they wanted to see at the cinema.

5 February 2013

During a routine inspection

People who used the service said that they were happy with the care and support they received. This was because people were treated with respect and supported in meeting their care needs, whilst maintaining their independence.

The provider and staff were aware of their responsibilities regarding protecting people from abuse. Staff told us they knew how to raise concerns. There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs.

The provider had quality assurance systems in place to check that the quality of the service being delivered was meeting people's needs.