• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Candid Care Service (Branch Agency)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

85 Turpin Avenue, Collier Row, Romford, Essex, RM5 2HY (01708) 609757

Provided and run by:
Candid Care Services

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

20 March 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 20 March 2015 and was unannounced. At our previous inspection of this service on 12 February 2014 we found they were not meeting the legal requirement relating to supporting staff. At this inspection they had met the legal requirement relating to supporting staff through appraisals and supervision.

Candid Care provides personal care for over 40 older adults in the London borough of Havering.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Risks to people and the environment were assessed and reviewed as and when people’s condition changed. Staff were aware of the accident and incident reporting procedures. Incidents were reviewed to identify patterns and provide the right support to people.

People were supported to understand how to stay safe. Staff told us that they always left the alarm pendants within reach of people so they could call for help when needed. Staff demonstrated that they understood how to recognise abuse and how to help protect people from the risk of abuse. Safeguarding procedures had been followed to keep people safe as evidenced by the notifications we received and the outcomes after investigation by the local authority.

Recruitment procedures were effective ensuring only staff who were suitable worked with people who used the service. Staff were supported through induction, supervision and training.

Medicines were handled and administered appropriately by staff who had been trained and assessed as competent to administer medicines.

Staff understood the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and could describe instances were decisions were made in people’s best interests.

People told us staff were kind and treated them with dignity and respect. Care plans reflected people’s preferences on how they wanted their care to be delivered.

The registered manager and staff understood their roles well. The quality of care delivered was monitored monthly and any issues raised were dealt with immediately. People were aware of how to make a complaint and told us that the complaints process was within the care record.

12 February 2014

During a routine inspection

People told us that they were happy with the services from the agency. People's support plans were based on assessment of needs. One person told us, "The staff know what to do for my wife."

There was a good process for recruiting staff and all appropriate checks were carried out before staff started to work. The provider supported their staff in their development and offered them supervision, training and feedback.

The provider informed people about the complaints procedure but did not receive any formal complaints. Incidents were managed appropriately and we saw that the manager took action where necessary. There were compliment letters, emails, texts and cards about the services. One person commented, "They are flexible and consider my needs."

18 March 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with voiced positive opinions about the service. People said they were treated with respect and dignity. Comments included "they asked us what times we'd like and what help we needed" and "I was able to explain what I wanted them to do." People told us that they were involved in drawing up their care plans. One person said "they came round and saw me and we discussed what I needed" another said "they wrote down what I needed them to do."

We found that the service had a safeguarding vulnerable adults procedure and that staff were aware of their responsibilities with regard to this. People using the service said that they felt safe. One person said 'if I had any concerns I would call the office.' There were sufficient staff to meet people's needs. People we spoke to said they usually had the same carers and staff we spoke to were familiar with the care needs of the people they supported. One person said "when one (carer) has a day off we have another of the regulars." We found that the service had a complaints procedure and people were aware of how to make a complaint if they wished to. One person who uses the service said "the information about complaints is all in the folder" another said "if I was not happy I'd call the office."