• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Direct Care Works Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Orchardson Avenue, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE4 6DP (0116) 262 9332

Provided and run by:
Direct Care Works Ltd

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile
Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

15 August 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 15 August 2016 and was announced. This meant we gave the provider 48 hours' notice of our visit because we wanted to make sure someone would be in the office to talk with us.

Direct Care Works Ltd is registered with the Care Quality Commission to provide personal care to people who wish to remain independent in their own homes. The service provides support and care for people in and around Leicester and provides for people living with a range of needs, including mental health and physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection there were nine people using the regulated activity.

The service is required to have a registered manager. At the time of our inspection, there was no registered manager in post and the day-to-day operations were being managed by the provider. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The provider was in the process of recruiting to the post of Registered Manager.

There were good systems in place to keep people safe. Assessments of risk had been undertaken and there was clear guidance for staff on what action to take in order to mitigate risks to people. Staff knew how to recognise the potential signs of abuse and what action to take to keep people safe. People were supported to take their medicines as prescribed.

People were supported by the number of staff identified as necessary in their care plans to keep them safe. There were robust recruitment and induction processes in place to ensure new members of staff were suitable to support people.

Staff had the skills and knowledge to ensure people received care in line with their care plans and best practice. There were regular formal and informal supervisions and observations of working practices which supported staff to meet people's care needs effectively.

People were supported to maintain good health and had assistance to access health care services when needed.

The provider and staff we spoke with were knowledgeable of and acted in line with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Staff sought consent from people before providing personal care.

People and their relatives told us staff were respectful and caring and supported them to maintain their privacy and dignity. People were offered choices and were involved in their own care. Staff were able to give examples how they supported people to maintain their independence and provided care that was never rushed but at the pace of the individual person.

People told us they were involved in their care plans and were consulted about their care to ensure wishes and preferences were met. Care plans and assessments contained relevant information for staff to help them provide the personalised care people required. People were given opportunities to share their views and opinions about the quality of care they received. People felt confident to complain and information was available in different formats to support people to express concerns and complaints.

People and their relatives were confident in how the service was led and the abilities of the management team. The provider and managers were committed to providing quality care and support for people. Staff had regular opportunities to feedback about people's care and were encouraged to share ideas with managers.

The provider, who was also the Operations Manager, undertook regular monitoring to evaluate the quality of the service. This included spot checks on staff working practices, audits of care records and review and analysis of key information such as complaints and incidents. We found that the Operations Manager was not always aware of their legal responsibilities. Although they had notified and worked with other agencies, such as local authorities, they had not notified Care Quality Commission of significant incidents in a timely manner.