• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

The London Endocrine Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

68 Harley Street, London, W1G 7HE (020) 7323 2755

Provided and run by:
Dr Paul Jenkins

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The London Endocrine Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The London Endocrine Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

31 May 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Choose a rating overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The London Endocrine Centre as part of our routine inspection program.

The service last had a compliance review 22 August 2012, when it was found to be meeting all of the required standards.

The service provides a private, specialist endocrine service to patients with endocrine diseases, for example hypothyroidism, polycystic ovary syndrome and diabetes. They also provided services for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and long COVID-19 symptoms.

The lead clinician is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • Staff training was up to date and all staff had safeguarding training to the appropriate level.
  • There was a small team where staff reported good levels of communication.
  • Medicines and test results were reviewed and managed appropriately, and in a timely manner. Medicines were prescribed appropriately and consent was gained to share information with patient GPs. Patients were given holistic care in order to treat immediate and ongoing heath needs.
  • Documentation and patient records were contemporaneous and of a high standard, and were kept securely in accordance with data protection laws.
  • Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with their care and treatment, that they had enough time with the doctor during appointments and commented that they felt ‘listened to’.
  • The provider evidenced a good understanding of patient needs and offered a variety of ways in which patients could access the service.
  • There were adequate policies and systems in place to ensure good governance.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Implement identification checks for new patients.
  • Implement a prescription record and monitoring system for paper prescriptions.
  • Commence formal significant event and complaint logs.
  • Display information to patients about how to make a complaint, requesting a chaperone, and interpretation services available.
  • Continue second cycles of audits and maintain ongoing quality improvement processes.
  • Formalise regular team meetings and take minutes for audit trail purposes.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

22 August 2012

During a routine inspection

One patient told us that he was given clear information about the service and described the doctor as "a good listener". The patient said that the doctor respected their personal views and involved them in making decisions about their treatment. We saw cards from patients thanking staff for "their kindness" and for their "extremely friendly and professional attitude".

One patient told us that they were satisfied with the quality of care that they received. We were told that the doctor discussed treatment plans with patients and gave copies of the plans to them in writing.