• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Thorncliffe Home Care

Office 19, No 4, St Thomas Street, Sunderland, Tyne And Wear, SR1 1NW (0191) 566 0938

Provided and run by:
Mr Philip Harrington Longmore

All Inspections

12 November 2013

During a routine inspection

With advance agreement we contacted and spoke with five people or their representatives about the service they received. They told us they were very happy with the service and the staff were "Excellent". They confirmed they had been given information about the service and they felt they had input into how the care was organised and given. One person told us they and their relative were 'Fully involved in the assessment' and 'We've just had a review which was really good'.

People told us the agency was flexible and responsive. One person, the daughter of a service user, told us the care manager was 'Very personable and professional', she told us that changes had been made to the service because the care worker had identified an unmet need for which additional visit time was required. The records were detailed, individualised and up to date, and staff knew about their content. They identified the way people preferred to be cared for and identified where risks were present and how to minimise these.

Staff were recruited using a robust system for making sure appropriate staff were safe to work with vulnerable people. For example each file we viewed contained a completed application form, a contract of employment and references as well as disclosure and barring checks

People were protected from the risks of unsafe or inappropriate care and treatment because accurate and appropriate records were maintained. Staff had a good understanding of how to maintain safe records.

20 December 2012

During a routine inspection

With their advance agreement we contacted and spoke with three people or their relatives about the service they received. People expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the service. They said they had been given detailed information about the service and they felt they had input into how their care was organised and given. One person told us that a supervisor visited them before the service began and provided choices about how the service could be delivered. Another person described the positive way staff communicated with them and that they almost always had the same staff visiting. All spoke highly of their care workers and more senior staff. One told us the service was 'First class' and another that the staff were 'Excellent, really good'.

One person told us they had confidence in the care workers and their relative felt safe and relaxed with them and that they had previously had a poor experience with another agency but Thorncliffe Home Care had 'Delivered the service they said they would'. Another person told us they felt there was 'Always two way communication with the agency' and 'We get our main staff and very rarely have others'. No one had any concerns and they all told us the communication in the agency was good. No one suggested any improvements the agency could make.

People who use the service were protected from the risk of abuse, because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening.

24 July 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

With their advance agreement we contacted and spoke with three people about the service they received, and we also talked with two relatives of other people. People expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the service they were receiving. They told us they had been given good information about the service and that they felt they had input into how their care was organised and given. They spoke highly of their care workers, and the more senior staff.

We were told that staff were flexible and responsive to any requests for changes to their care. Staff were described as being reliable and punctual, as well as being respectful and discrete.

One person told us they had confidence in their care workers and felt safe and relaxed when they were in the house. They also felt that the management of the agency listened to their views and usually acted upon them. No one had any concerns, and that the communication in the agency was good. No one was able to suggest any improvements the agency could make.

One relative told us that they had been visited by the proprietor in their own home to find out how she felt about the service her relative was receiving. She said that she was impressed with this but that she also could contact another named person if she wanted to discuss anything.

22 November 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We did not meet or have contact with anyone using the service as this review was carried out at the agency office. No comments or feedback had been received since our last review visits on 6 September and 31 October 2011.

5, 12 May 2011

During a routine inspection

People using the service and their relatives all spoke highly of the quality of care which they received. They were confident in both the management team and the care workers and described a punctual, reliable service delivered by competent and caring staff.