• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Purley Centre Marsh Farm

14 Purley Centre, Marsh Farm Estate, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU3 3SR (01582) 503040

Provided and run by:
Mr. Sanjiv Manubhai Jagsi

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

30 April 2013

During a routine inspection

During our visit to the Purley Dental Surgery on 30 April 2013 we spoke with four people who used the service. All were very positive about their experiences. One person said, "If I wasn't satisfied I wouldn't come back and this is my 5th or 6th appointment."

Everyone told us they were treated respectfully and did not feel their privacy was compromised. We witnessed the receptionist supporting people to make appointments at a time that best suited them. Another person told us that they felt comfortable taking their baby in the pushchair into the surgery; something which was important to them. This also confirmed that the service was accessible to people with mobility problems as the service was situated on the ground floor and accessed via a wide doorway.

Since our last visit the service had made a number of improvements, including introducing a system to ensure people's satisfaction with the service. We looked at some of the comments made and saw that overall people were satisfied, with the exception of sometimes having to wait up to 10 minutes for their appointment. We observed that the receptionist kept people informed if the dentist was running late. However one person told us when they had needed an appointment in an emergency they had been seen within two hours so they understood why they sometimes had to wait for a routine appointment.

9 October 2012

During a routine inspection

During this visit on 9 October 2012 we spoke with two people who were waiting for treatment. For one person this was via a family member who was acting as an interpreter. People told us they were treated politely and the dentist involved them in their treatment plan. However information about the service was not always available for people and they were not asked for their opinions about how the service was run.

People we spoke with told us the staff were helpful and kind, however we could not see documented evidence to show how the provider had checked that staff were suitable to work with vulnerable adults and children.

The service had a complaints procedure but this was not easily accessible to people which could mean that the service did not use complaints to learn from and improve the service