• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Hanham Dental Practice

68 High Street, Hanham, Bristol, BS15 3DS (0117) 960 2940

Provided and run by:
Dr Denzil Le Roy

All Inspections

25 June 2014

During a routine inspection

The purpose of this inspection was to find out answers to five key questions. Is the practice caring? Is the practice responsive? Is the practice safe? Is the practice effective? Is the practice well led?

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our observations during the inspection where we sought information about patients experience and gained views from patients who used the practice, the staff who supported them and from looking at records.

We spoke with the practice owner (dentist) dental nurses and receptionists, in addition to spending time with the practice manager. We also spoke with the other two providers (dentists) who use the practice and are registered individually with the Care Quality Commission.

Is the practice safe?

Patients told us they felt safe because they had confidence in their dentist and because the dentist was qualified. The practice had made child protection referrals in the past, trained staff and had policies and guidance for them to follow in regards to patient safety. There were quality assurance measures in place to ensure safe services were provided. We saw satisfactory arrangements for the management of infection control processes.

Is the practice effective?

The frequency of appointments was based on national guidance. Staff had knowledge of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and understood how this protected patients who were unable to give consent to treatment. Where people needed specialist treatment the provider referred them to another service. We saw in patient records how patients had been given oral health advice.

Is the practice caring?

Patients described staff as friendly and told us they were given treatment options. They said the dentist explained treatment to them and they were asked to consent. We observed good relationships between staff and patients.

Is the practice responsive?

The opening hours were displayed along with, the arrangements for out of hours and emergency appointments. The practice was able to support people of different nationalities and made arrangements for people with disabilities. Patients were consulted about the service provided and complaints were responded to appropriately.

Is the practice well led?

The practice aimed to provide a dental service of a consistently high quality and sought patients views in support of this. There were good monitoring arrangements, including risk assessments. The provider (dentist) was well liked and the practice manager was described by staff as supportive and we observed a cohesive staff team.

18 January 2012

During a routine inspection

Three people we spoke with told us they were happy with the treatment they received and that the dentist explained options to them. We spoke with one person who was new to the practice, they told us that the dentist had explained everything to them during their check up and they were pleased with the service. One person was waiting for an emergency appointment and confirmed that staff had advised them of how long they would have to wait to see the dentist and they were happy to wait.