• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Fairways

279 Easdale Gardens, Wrekenton, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, NE9 7EE (0191) 491 0518

Provided and run by:
Dr Vayalil Pillai

All Inspections

11 June 2014

During a routine inspection

We considered our inspection findings to answer questions we always ask;

' Is the service safe?

' Is the service effective?

' Is the service caring?

' Is the service responsive?

' Is the service well-led?

This is a summary of what we found-

Is the service safe?

People told us they felt happy and relaxed living in the home. Relatives told us they felt their relatives were well-protected and safe. One relative told us, 'I have no worries at all about the home.' There were enough staff on duty to meet the needs of the people living at the home and the manager was available on call in case of emergencies.

Staff personnel records demonstrated that the staff employed to work at the home were suitable and had the skills and experience needed to support the people living in the home.

CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards which applies to care homes. While no applications had needed to be submitted, proper policies and procedures were in place.

People's medicines were safely stored and administered.

Systems were in place for checking safety equipment and systems such as fire alarms and hot water temperatures.

Is the service effective?

Relatives said they felt their relatives needs were met. One relative told us, 'They know X properly and pick up on everything. Nothing escapes them.'

We observed people living in the home were relaxed and confident with their care workers. Staff demonstrated a good knowledge of people's care needs and preferences, and how those needs should be met. Those people able to describe their care told us that they were happy with the care they received and felt they were treated with respect. One person told us, 'I like it here.' Another person said, 'It's a nice place to live.'

Is the service caring?

People were supported by kind and attentive staff, who showed patience and gave encouragement when supporting people. Relationships seemed based on mutual respect and affection. Our observations showed us that people were able to do things at their own pace and were not rushed. One person said, 'I like it here. The staff are nice.' Another person told us, 'We all get on well.' A relative told us, 'The staff are always very caring.'

Is the service responsive?

People's needs had been assessed before they moved into the home. People were asked for their views and said they felt listened to. Records confirmed people's preferences, interests, aspirations and diverse needs had been recorded and care and support had been provided in accordance with people's wishes. One person told us, 'Amanda [the manager] listens to us. We can say if we're not happy.' People had good access to their preferred activities and had been supported to maintain personal relationships with their friends and relatives.

Most professionals told us the service responded well to any issues raised, and took on board any advice given. One professional said, 'There are no concerns from a nursing point of view.' A second professional told us the manager and staff always followed advice given to them.

Is the service well-led?

A relative told us, 'The home is well-managed. The manager is well-organised and keeps us informed.' This person told us they could not think how the home could be improved. Professionals told us people were receiving appropriate and person-centred care. One professional told us, 'The home is in pretty good shape.'

Staff had a good understanding of the ethos of the home and effective quality assurance processes were in place. People who used the service were asked for their views about their care and treatment in regular meetings and their views were acted upon. One person told us she could say anything she liked to the staff and they would always listen to her and try to help her. Staff spoke highly of the manager, and said she always took their views into consideration.

20 June 2013

During a routine inspection

People or their representatives were given the information they needed to make an informed decision about their care and were asked to provide their consent to such care. We saw people were cared for effectively and care was planned for the individual.

We saw people were safe and protected from abuse. Staff were suitably qualified and experienced to care for people.

There were effective systems in place to monitor the service and to record and monitor complaints. Complaints were taken seriously and responded to appropriately.

The representatives of people who used the service were positive about the care and support provided. Comments included 'They provide good quality care' and 'It is a lovely home'.

21 September 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people using the service. Due to their communication needs, it was difficult for us to get detailed comments from some people living at the service. Those people we spoke with said they were happy at Fairways.

One person said; 'It's good here, I want to stay here for good.' Another said, 'I've no complaints.'

People told us they were happy with the care and treatment they were receiving. One person said, "I'm happy here.' Another person commented, 'Nice here.' A visiting relative expressed their satisfaction with the service offered and told us they were happy with the care and support offered by staff.

People told us they were happy with the staff at Fairways and were able to tell us who their key worker was and what they would do for them. A visiting relative expressed satisfaction with the staff and stated they felt staff offered care with human contact, but also in an appropriate and professional manner.

20 December 2011

During a routine inspection

We carried out an unannounced visit as part of this review.

There were six people living in the service. Each of them had their own bedroom and shared the living and dining area. There was a domestic type kitchen area and a pleasant garden area which was kept in good order so that the people could use it, weather permitting.

The people we met who were living at Fairways had speech and language impairment and were not able to communicate verbally with them. They were not able to tell us in detail their views or about their experiences, although we were able to observe how they were spoken with by the staff and the way they responded. They were able to give us some information through their body language and by gesturing. The people living in the service who we met were being supported by staff on a one to one basis and they were responding very positively to the staff that were with them.

One of the people living in the service took us around the home themselves however they looked repeatedly to the care workers for reassurance when we spoke to them and the staff provided this support without it being intrusive or inappropriate.

The staff were assisting the people living in Fairways in their usual daily activities, including playing a game of animal dominoes, watching television or having a meal. They responded to their needs in a professional and pleasant way and were clear about how the individual was supported. These activities maximised people's independence while maintaining their safety and wellbeing.

The atmosphere in the home was quiet and calm and the staff were very focused on the people they were supporting.