• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Pro-Care Dispersed Housing Ltd - Sherbourne Lodge

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

3 Sherbourne Road, Blackpool, Lancashire, FY1 2PW (01253) 294819

Provided and run by:
Pro-Care Disperse Housing Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

23 August 2017

During a routine inspection

Sherbourne provides care and support for a maximum of six people who live with mental health conditions. The home is situated in a residential area of Blackpool’s North Shore. It offers six single bedrooms over two floors. In addition, there is a dining room, lounge and conservatory. A separate office and staff sleepover room is a recent addition to Sherbourne Lodge.

A registered manager was in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the last inspection on 22 April 2015, the service was rated ‘Good’. However, we found during this unannounced inspection, on 23 August 2017, concerns and a breach of regulations.

During this inspection, we found issues with how people’s medicines were stored and recorded. There was a miscount of medication given and recorded stock that remained. Medicines, including controlled drugs, were in unlocked cupboards in an office left unattended for long periods. This meant anyone, including members of the public, could access dangerous medicines. This demonstrated the registered manager did not always protect people from the unsafe management of their medicines. They did not have clear oversight of procedures and recordkeeping. This is a breach of Regulation 12 Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 Safe care and treatment.

You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

People were encouraged to complete surveys to check their satisfaction levels with the service. The registered manager, staff and those who lived at the home worked closely together on a daily basis and held regular meetings. This meant any issues could be addressed immediately. The registered manager had a range of systems to retain oversight of the home and maintain everyone’s safety and wellbeing.

Care records we reviewed contained risk assessments to guide staff about protecting people from potential risks of inappropriate or unsafe support. Staff received safeguarding training to underpin their knowledge about protecting people from abuse or poor practice. People told us they felt safe and secure whilst living at Sherbourne. One person said, “I feel settled and safe here.”

The registered manager acquired necessary documents to ensure staff were fit and proper persons before they commenced in post. People told us staffing levels were sufficient to meet their needs. Staff had completed a range of training to assist them with their development, skills and understanding.

Staff had a good understanding of the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and associated Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. Staff worked collaboratively with people in discussing and agreeing their care plans. Those who lived at the home said they felt free and able to come and go as they pleased.

All staff who prepared food had completed food hygiene training to assist them to maintain food safety standards. The registered manager had systems, such as weight checks and risk assessments, to reduce the potential risk of malnutrition.

It was evident to us people were relaxed and felt able to interact with staff with ease and in a familiar, friendly way. One person told us, “The staff are good with me.” Care records we looked at evidenced people were fully involved in agreeing and developing support plans.

Staff completed people’s records with a person-centred approach. They had a good level of information about each person’s self-caring skills and the support they required. The registered manager had further guided staff to assist people to maintain their independence.

22 April 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection visit at Sherbourne Lodge was undertaken on 22 April 2015 and was unannounced.

Sherbourne Lodge provides care and support for a maximum of six people with mental health conditions. At the time of our inspection the home was fully occupied. Sherbourne Lodge is situated in a residential area of Blackpool. It offers six single room accommodation on two floors. Additionally, there is a dining room and communal lounge.

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the last inspection on 10 May 2013, we asked the provider to take action to make improvements to the safety and suitability of equipment within the home. We further requested the provider reviewed staffing levels to provide support for external activities to maintain people’s independence and developed quality assurance systems. At the follow-up inspection on 21 November 2013 we observed improvements had been completed and the service was meeting the requirements of the regulations.

During this inspection, people who lived at the home told us they felt safe. We observed staff were supportive of individuals and had a good understanding of their individual needs. People told us they felt staff were very caring. One person said, “I feel much happier here. I feel calm and relaxed.”

Staff demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of how to protect service users against abuse. Risk assessments were in place to protect people from the potential risks of receiving care and support. People told us they were involved in their care and that staff supported them to retain their independence. Staffing levels and skill mixes were sufficient to meet people’s needs and to keep them safe.

We observed staff demonstrated an effective understanding of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Records contained evidence that people had consented to agreed support to meet their identified requirements. A staff member told us, “It’s about ensuring people are given a choice and listening to our residents. We encourage them to speak with their social worker to help them have a voice.”

Staff worked with individuals to ensure they received appropriate support and followed their agreed care plans. Care records were up-to-date and individualised to the person’s identified requirements. People’s medication was managed and administered in a safe manner.

Staff were adequately trained and supported to carry out their duties effectively. People told us they felt their support was delivered by staff who were experienced and understood their needs.

Staff and service users commented that the home was well-led. They stated that the registered manager supported them and was visible within the home. People were assisted to comment about the home and told us they felt able to complain, should they need to do so. The management team carried out frequent audits to protect the welfare and health and safety of staff, visitors and people who lived at the home.

21 November 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

At our previous inspection in May 2013 we found that there had been delays in repairing fixtures and fittings in the kitchen and bathroom. We also found that staffing levels did not promote enhancement of people's skills and independence. During this inspection we found these concerns had been addressed by the manager.

We spoke with a range of people about the home. They included the registered manager, staff members and people who used the service. We also asked for the views of external agencies in order to gain a balanced overview of the service provided by Sherbourne Lodge.

People who use the service told us they were happy with the support they received. One person said, "I have been here a long time. I like it here. I have no problems" People told us their needs had been discussed and they had agreed to the support to be provided. They told us their carers provided flexible support and they felt well cared for.

10 May 2013

During a routine inspection

On the whole, people experienced care, treatment and support that met their needs. Implementing a structured system of support, with the right staffing levels, that concentrated on how to enable people to develop their skills and independence would further enhance people's experience. Where people did not have the capacity to consent, the provider acted in accordance with legal requirements.

People experienced care, treatment and support that met their needs and protected their rights. People who use the service were protected from the risk of abuse, because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening.

We found that some of the kitchen cupboards had fallen apart following a water leak; that paint had flaked off one of the kitchen walls; and some of tile work around the sinks needed to be replaced. The state of this equipment was found to be unsafe and unsuitable as they posed risks to people's general safety. We found the bathroom to be a cold and uninviting room. The walls were bland, and all that was in the room was a bathroom and toilet. We spoke to people about the bathroom Staff and people living at the home agreed that the bathroom needed to be decorated. People living at the home thought that the installation of a shower above the bath would be useful. There had been delays in responding to these reviews, leaving equipment in need of repair and replacement.

3 December 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with a range of people about the home. They included the area manager, the one staff member on duty at the service, a relative and people who lived at the home. We also had responses from external agencies including social services. This helped us to gain a balanced overview of what people experienced living at Sherbourne Lodge.

People told us they could express their views and were involved in decision making about their care. They told us they felt listened to when discussing their care needs. One relative spoken to said, 'It's the best place for him, they are good to him.'

People living in the home said they felt that they were safe at Sherbourne Lodge. They said staff were approachable and kind and they could talk to them.

Residents told us the staff team were friendly and supportive. They said routines were flexible, they could come and go as they please. One person also said they could get up and go to bed when they wished.

People who used the service told us staff treated them with dignity and respect. We saw evidence of this when observing interaction with the staff member and residents. This included staff knocking on doors before entering and speaking to people using their preferred name.

23 February and 6 March 2012

During an inspection in response to concerns

People told us they can express their views and are involved in decision making about their care. They said they had been involved in the assessment of their care needs and attended meetings with the staff to review the care being provided for them. They told us they attend meetings within the house and are encouraged to express their views about the service provided. We spoke to people about their experiences living in the home and were told the staff team were friendly and supportive. They told us routines were flexible, they could come and go as they please and they could get up and go to bed when they wished.

'I was visited by the provider before I agreed to move into the home. We discussed my needs and the support they could provide for me. It was explained to me that the home provided an independent living environment and I would be supported to undertake tasks for myself. It is my intention to get my own flat and live unsupported in the community. They are trying to help me achieve this'.

'I am happy with the support provided. I have maintained regular contact with my family which is important to me. The routines are relaxed and we have access to the kitchen for snacks and drinks throughout the day. The staff make most of my meals and always ask us what we would like. I have no complaints about anything'.

'Good support from the staff, I am very impressed with them. I was poorly recently but with their support I now feel much better'.

'I moved here from another home and like this one better. It's nice and quiet and the staff are great. I get on really well with them'.

'I am fully involved in decision making about the support I need. I have access to my care plan and attend reviews. I feel in control of my life and will hopefully move onto having a place of my own'.

'We have regular meetings in the house and are encouraged to speak up about the service provided. I have also recently completed a questionnaire providing my views about the staff and the support they provide'.

5 March 2012

During an inspection in response to concerns

People wishing to self-administer medication were able to do so but, we found a lack of up-to-date written information about how safe self-administration was supported. People we spoke with were happy for care workers to look after and administer their medicines.