• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Boston Lodge

35 Earlsdon Avenue South, Coventry, West Midlands, CV5 6DN (024) 7671 7506

Provided and run by:
Optimum Care Services

All Inspections

26 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We visited Boston Lodge on 26 April 2013. The inspection was part of our annual inspection programme as well as a follow up to check on areas of concern identified at our last inspection in September 2012. We spoke with people who lived at the home, a visitor, two staff members and the manager.

Each person living there had a care plan which set out their identified needs and how staff were to meet those needs. There were processes in place to assess and minimise risk. During our visit we observed people being supported by staff in a kindly, caring manner and in accordance with their care plans.

Staff were being supported to access regular training so they had the skills to deliver care effectively. Staff told us they felt well supported by the manager.

We checked medication and found there were systems in place to ensure medication was administered safely.

The provider had systems in place to monitor the quality of the service provided.

17 September 2012

During a routine inspection

We visited Boston Lodge on 17 September 2012. There were 13 people living in the home at the time of our visit. No one knew we would be visiting. We spoke with three people who lived there, four members of staff, a visiting relative and the area manager. The manager was on annual leave at the time of our visit. We were unable to view some records as only the manager had access to them. We spent time observing interactions between staff and the people living at Boston Lodge.

Boston Lodge has 13 bedrooms, all with their own en-suite shower room. There is a large lounge, conservatory, quiet room and dining room. The home has been adapted for the needs of older people with visual and hearing impairments.

There was a relaxed atmosphere in the home. We observed warm interactions between the people who lived there and the staff. Staff were knowledgeable about people's care needs and the support they required. One visiting relative told us, "My experience has been that every time she has needed something it has been met."

The home was unable to provide evidence that risk assessments were in place to support staff to deliver care safely.

The provider had recently responded to a rise in the level of need of those who live in the home by increasing staff levels during the day.

People living in the home and those who visit were not routinely asked for their views about the quality of care provided.