• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Woodhaven Residential Home

Beacon Way, Walsall Wood, Walsall, West Midlands, WS9 9HZ (01543) 377548

Provided and run by:
Woodhaven Homes Limited

All Inspections

25 October 2013

During a routine inspection

Our inspection was unannounced, this meant the staff and people using the service did not know we were coming. There were 19 people using the service at the time of the inspection. We spoke with five people using the service, a visiting district nurse, four staff and the registered manager.

We saw people received appropriate care because their needs were assessed before care was delivered. People had care records which included up to date information about how they wanted their care and support provided. We saw information to demonstrate how arrangements to seek people's consent to care or treatment had been agreed. This ensured the provider could meet people's individual needs.

People using the service were happy with the care they received. One person said, 'I can't tell you how well they manage everything, they are so good I could cry.' Another person told us, 'Everyone is looked after well, the goodness they have in them is amazing. I feel so safe here they look after us so well.'

We observed medication practices and saw systems were in place to manage medication safely and effectively.

We saw records to confirm staff were recruited appropriately ensuring vulnerable people were suitably supported.

The staff received training that was appropriate for their individual needs. This provided them with the information and knowledge they needed to care for people with dementia appropriately.

31 August 2012

During a routine inspection

During our visit we spoke with the registered manager and with staff about their experiences of working at the home.

We also spoke with people living at the service and their families about whether they liked living at the home.

Some people due to the nature of their needs were unable to tell us their opinions about living at the home. We used other methods to better understand their needs to include surveys completed by their relatives.

People using the service and their relatives told us they were happy with the service they received and the staff who worked with them. One service user told us, 'I find the staff to be perfect and the food is alright'

Staff we spoke with told us they enjoyed working at the home and received appropriate training to undertake their work competently. They also told us they received appropriate support from the management team.

We looked at six key outcomes to establish whether people were involved and participated in the service they received; whether care was provided appropriately; whether the service could adequately ensure people's safety within the home; whether the environment was safe and fit for purpose; whether there were sufficient staffing levels and whether there was a system for ensuring ongoing quality assurance within the home. We found that Woodhaven Residential Home was compliant in these six outcomes that we inspected.

17 August 2011

During a routine inspection

During our visit to this home we spent time watching the care people received and how staff interacted with them. This is because people living in this home have dementia care needs. Some people were not able to communicate with us verbally to tell us their views of the care they receive. We saw that in most cases there were very little interactions between staff and people living in the home. Staff undertook the tasks they needed to do, but in the main interactions with people were brief. We saw that people received the physical care that they need. However their overall mental well-being was not fully supported.

Following this inspection, we asked the local safeguarding to investigate two matters that we were concerned about regarding people's safety and their rights.

We found that the environment within the home was not being maintained to support good outcomes for people.

We found that people living at the home have a significant number of falls and people cannot be assured that there were sufficient staff to meet their needs.

We found that the home audits various aspects of the home, but the systems for assuring quality are not as effective as they should be. This means that people cannot be assured that they were receiving a service that provides consistently best outcomes for them.

People's relatives that we spoke to were happy with the care provided and had no concerns about the home. One relative told us: 'I have nothing to complain about, they are all really kind, dad seems really comfortable. If I had a problem I would speak to the manager'.