• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: 209 Weston Road

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

209 Weston Road, Meir, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST3 6AT (01782) 596056

Provided and run by:
Lifeways Orchard Care Limited

All Inspections

17 October 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 17 October 2016 and was unannounced. At our previous inspection in November 2015 we had concerns that care being delivered was not always, safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led. We had found the provider in breach of three Regulations of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 and asked the provider to improve. Following the inspection the provider sent us an action plan telling us how they planned to make the required improvements. At this inspections we found most improvements had been made, however further improvements were required.

209 Weston Road provides accommodation and personal care for up to six people with a learning disability. At the time of the inspection three people were using the service.

The registered manager was absent from the service on the day of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Although people were asked about their care, the provider and manager did not always take prompt action to improve when people identified concerns or meet people's requests.

People were safeguarded from abuse as staff and the manager knew what to do if they suspected someone had been abused.

There were sufficient staff to keep people safe. They had been employed using safe recruitment procedures.

People's medicines were administered and stored safely.

Risks of harm to people had been assessed and plans put in place to minimise the risk.

The provider was following the principles of the MCA by ensuring that people were consenting to or were being supported to consent to their care and support.

Staff were supported and trained to be effective in their roles.

People's nutritional needs were met and they received health care support when they became unwell or their needs changed.

People were treated with dignity and respect and their right to privacy was upheld.

People received care that was personalised and met their individual needs and preferences. People were offered opportunities to be engage in hobbies and activities of their choice.

People's care was regularly reviewed to ensure it met their current needs.

People were involved in decision making about their care and asked their views on the service. People felt able to complain if they needed to.

The manager was respected and had made some improvements to the quality of the service since our last inspection.

23 November 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on the 23 November 2015 and was unannounced. At our previous inspection in August 2013 there were no concerns found in the areas we looked at.

The service provided accommodation and personal care to up to six people with a learning disability. At the time of the inspection four people were using the service.

We were supported throughout the inspection by the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People's capacity to consent had not been assessed and some decisions were being made on behalf of people without the support they required. We found that people were being deprived of their liberty unlawfully as applications for a DoLS authorisation had not been made.

There were insufficient staff to safely meet the needs of people during the night.

People’s medicines were administered by trained staff, however medicines were not stored safely.

People were not always involved in decisions relating to their care, treatment and support. Care was not always planned and delivered based on people’s preferences and regularly reviewed with people.

People were not always treated with kindness and compassion. People’s right to privacy was respected.

When areas for improvement had been identified, they were not made to ensure a safe, quality service was provided.

We found three breaches of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of the report.

People had opportunities to be involved in the community and to participate in hobbies and interests of their choice. However people’s requests to participate in these activities were not always responded to.

People were supported to have a healthy diet dependent on their assessed individual needs. People were given choices and asked what they would like to eat and drink.

People were safeguarded from abuse and the risk of abuse as staff knew what constituted abuse and who to report it to. The manager had previously made referrals for further investigation when they had suspected abuse had taken place.

People were supported to be as independent as they were able to be through the effective use of risk assessments and the staff knowledge of them.

Staff felt supported to fulfil their role effectively through regular support and supervision and training applicable to their role.

21 August 2013

During a routine inspection

This was a scheduled unannounced inspection of 209 Weston Road.

We found that people who used the service at 209 Weston Road were happy and able to make decisions about their care and everyday activities. Where people needed assistance with more complex decisions the service ensured that their best interests were met.

We saw that people had choices about what they ate and were involved in selecting menus and preparing food. People were assisted to eat where this was needed. A person who used the service said, 'I like making fish cakes'.

People we spoke with told us they felt safe at the home. Staff had received training, and guidance was available to them on how to support people with challenging behaviour and protect them and others.

Staff received training and support appropriate to their role. A member of staff said, 'The manager is brilliant, she mucks in with the rest of us and is always there for advice'.

3 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection to check on the care and welfare of people using this service. The inspection was unannounced, which meant the registered provider and the staff did not know we were coming. We spoke with three people using the service and three staff.

The routines and daily activities were flexible and staff responded to people's needs. The staffing provided ensured people were able to carry out planned activities. People spoke positively about the staff and the support they delivered. We saw people chose what to do and where to go and were provided with assistance from staff to keep safe in the community.

We saw that people's needs were assessed and care records were in place which recorded people's identified needs..Health records confirmed that people were supported to attend appointments with health professionals.

We looked at the way in which the home managed people's medicines and found that these were managed well. Two people told us they looked after their own medication and staff checked if they had taken them.

Staff told us that they were supported in their roles by the management of the home. People using the service felt there were sufficient staff on duty to meet their needs and do the things they wanted to do.

20 June and 4 July 2011

During a routine inspection

The previous key inspection report told us that relatives and people using the service had been satisfied with the care they received.

During our visit we spoke with people using the service and staff members. We also spoke with relatives. Feedback comments about the service included, 'they are very nice staff', 'it's a nice home'; 'If I want something doing for my relative, the staff do it for me.' 'Staff there is very good; my relative is settled in there now'. 'Staff are trustworthy, I feel reassured by that.'