• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: The Gardens Residential Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

88 Sleaford Road, Boston, Lincolnshire, PE21 8EY (01205) 359797

Provided and run by:
Minstrels Healthcare Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

19 April 2016

During a routine inspection

This was an unannounced inspection carried out on 19 April 2016.

The Gardens Residential Home can provide accommodation and personal care for 47 older people and people who live with dementia. There were 40 people living in the service at the time of our inspection most of whom were older people. The accommodation is a purpose built, two storey property. The service is divided into two units. On the ground floor the unit is called Aspen which is reserved for 11 people who live with dementia. On the first floor the unit is called Gardenside where 36 people can live.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff knew how to respond to any concerns that might arise so that people were kept safe from abuse including financial mistreatment. People had been helped to avoid the risk of accidents and medicines were managed safely. There were enough staff on duty and background checks had been completed before new staff were appointed.

Staff had received training and guidance and they knew how to support people in the right way including making sure that people were supported to promote their continence. People had been assisted to eat and drink enough and they had been supported to receive all of the healthcare assistance they needed.

Staff had ensured that people’s rights were respected by helping them to make decisions for themselves. The Care Quality Commission is required by law to monitor how registered persons apply the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and to report on what we find. These safeguards protect people when they are not able to make decisions for themselves and it is necessary to deprive them of their liberty in order to keep them safe. In relation to this, the registered manager had taken the necessary steps to ensure that people only received lawful care that respected their rights.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff recognised people’s right to privacy, promoted their dignity and respected confidential information.

People had been consulted about the care they wanted to receive and they had been given all of the assistance they needed including people who could become distressed. Some people wanted more opportunities to purse their hobbies and interests. There was a system for resolving complaints.

Quality checks had been completed to ensure that people received the facilities and services they needed. Good team work was promoted and staff were supported to speak out if they had any concerns because the service was run in an open and inclusive way. People had benefited from staff acting upon good practice guidance.

17 November 2014

During a routine inspection

The Gardens Residential Home provides accommodation for up to 47 people who need support with their personal care. The service provides care for older people and people who are living with dementia. The accommodation is purpose built over two floors. Aspen Suite on the ground floor provides self-contained accommodation for 11 people who live with dementia and who need close support.

There were 41 people living in the service at the time of our inspection.

This was an unannounced inspection carried out on 17 November 2014. There was a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The Care Quality Commission is required by law to monitor how a provider applies the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and to report on what we find. DoLS are in place to protect people where they do not have capacity to make decisions and where it is considered necessary to restrict their freedom in some way. This is usually to protect themselves or others. At the time of our inspection no people had had their freedom restricted.

We last inspected The Gardens Residential Home in May 2013. At that inspection we found the service was meeting all the essential standards that we assessed.

People felt safe in the service. Staff knew how to keep people safe from harm. However, some parts of the recruitment and selection procedure were not robust. This was because some background checks on a new member of staff had not been completed.

People had received all of the care they needed. This included assistance with a wide range of personal care such as help with washing and dressing, using the bathroom and moving about safely.

People who lived in the service and their families had been included in planning and agreeing to the care provided. People had an individual care plan, detailing the assistance they needed and how they wanted this to be provided.

Staff knew the people they were supporting and the choices they had made about their care and their lives. People were supported to maintain their independence and control over their lives.

People were treated with kindness, compassion and respect. Staff took time to speak with the people they were supporting. We saw many positive interactions and people enjoyed talking to the staff in the service. However, some of the support people received to dine at lunchtime and to access their bedrooms did not promote their dignity and privacy.

People were offered the opportunity to pursue their interests and hobbies.

29 May 2013

During a routine inspection

During our visit we spoke to five people who lived in the home, a selection of staff members, the manager and a visiting healthcare professional.

Due to the complex needs of some of the people who lived at the home we also used a number of different ways to help us understand their experiences. For example, we spent time observing the care people received and we looked at a range of records kept in the home. The records we looked at included people's care files and information about how the home operated.

People we spoke with said they were happy living at the home. They made comments such as, 'I feel safe here', 'I have no worries, I get everything I need' and 'The staff are lovely, they can't do enough for you.'

People we spoke with also said they knew how to make a complaint if they needed to.

Throughout the day we saw staff supporting people in a dignified and respectful way. They also showed us that they knew about people's needs, likes and dislikes and supported people to have the care they wanted.

There was an effective system in place for the provider to monitor and assess the quality of services within the home. Records were kept up to date and in a secure way.

15 June 2012

During a routine inspection

We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of people who used the service. This was because some people had complex needs which meant that they were not able to tell us about their experiences. We spoke to some people who lived in the home and their relatives, and we looked at records, including personal care plans. We spoke to the manager and staff who were supporting people, and we observed how they provided that support. We also spoke to other professionals who provided support for people but did not work at the home.

We saw that people who lived in the home received individualised care and support, from staff that were knowledgeable about their needs, wishes and preferences.

People said things like '9 out of 10 for the place as a whole,' 'I would like condiments on tables instead of asking for them,' 'They know what I like and look after me very well,' and 'I wouldn't want to live anywhere else.'

Professionals who did not work at the home told us that the service offered personalised support for people, and were very responsive to people's needs.

29 December 2010 and 18 January 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

Some people were unable to share their experiences with us, while others could. People told us that they were happy with the care and support they received and praised the staff. They said that staff listened to them and respected their wishes.

People said that they had no complaints but if anything arose they would be happy to talk to the manager and staff about it. One person said, 'I can't fault them', while another commented 'they are very good'.

A relative told us: 'I am very happy with the way my mother is looked after, she always looks well presented and cared for'.