• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Social Care Personal Assistants Limited

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Unit 33, Easton Business Centre, Felix Road, Bristol, Avon, BS5 0HE (0117) 941 5323

Provided and run by:
Social Care Personal Assistants Limited

All Inspections

11 January 2017

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 11 January 2017. We gave the registered manager 48 hours’ notice of our intention to undertake an inspection. This was because the organisation provides a domiciliary care service to people in their own homes and we needed to be sure that someone would be available at the office.

Social Care and Personal Assistants is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people in their own homes. There were three people being supported with personal care at the time of our inspection.

At the last inspection of the service in 21 June 2016 we found the service was not meeting the regulations in regards safe recruitment of suitable staff. The provider sent us an action plan of how they would ensure this would not happen again. At this inspection we found that this regulation had been met.

There was a registered manager in place for the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required by law to monitor the operation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005(MCA) and report on what we find. No one being supported by the service lacked the mental capacity to make day-to-day decisions. Staff demonstrated to us that they respected people’s choices about how they would like to be supported. However, not all staff were able to demonstrate a sufficiently robust understanding of MCA. The lack of understanding could increase the risk that any decisions made on people's behalf by staff may not be in their best interest and as least restrictive as possible.

Plans were put in place to reduce people’s identified risks, to enable people to live as safe and independent a life as possible. Arrangements were in place to ensure that people were prompted with their prescribed medication when needed. However, staff were administering medicines without recording them on the medicines administration record. This meant that accurate records of staff supporting people with their prescribed medication could not be kept.

People were supported by staff in a respectful and caring way. Individualised support and care plans were in place which recorded people’s care and support needs. These plans enabled staff to identify any assistance a person may have required.

Arrangements were in place to assist people when needed to access a range of external health care professionals and were assisted to maintain their health and well-being. Where required, staff supported people to maintain their links with the local community to promote social inclusion. People’s health and nutritional needs were met.

People were able to raise any concerns or suggestions that they had with the registered manager and staff and they felt listened to. Communication between people and the office and staff management was good.

Pre-employment safety checks were in place to ensure that all new staff were deemed suitable to work with the people they supported. There were enough staff available to meet people’s care and support needs. Staff understood their responsibility to report any concerns about poor care practice.

Staff undertook training to provide care that met people’s individual care and support needs. Staff were assisted with their training needs by the registered manager to maintain and develop their skills. The standard of staff members’ work performance was reviewed by the registered manager through supervisions, appraisals and spot checks. This was to ensure that staff were competent and confident to deliver the care and support required.

The registered manager sought feedback about the quality of the service provided from people who used the service. Staff were notified of any updates and changes to the service via e-mail communication. Quality monitoring processes to review and identify areas of improvement required within the service were in place.

21 June 2016

During a routine inspection

Social Care Personal Assistants Limited is a domiciliary care service that provides care and support to people living in their own homes. In total, the service provided personal care to four people intermittently. When we inspected there was only one person receiving a service regulated by the Care Quality Commission. The other three people were either not currently receiving a care package, on holiday or in hospital.

As a result of this we were not able to provide a rating for this service due to the limited evidence available. We will complete a further inspection in the future to ascertain if we can obtain sufficient evidence to rate the service.

The owner of the agency was the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were not fully protected from the risk of harm as safe and robust recruitment procedures were not always completed.

People’s risks were assessed and guidance for staff was recorded to reduce identified risks. The provider did not support people with their medicines so we were unable to make a judgement on this. Staff understood how to report abuse. We were unable to make a judgement on staffing due to the low number of people the service supported.

The provider ensured that staff received an induction and training was completed by staff to meet the needs of the people using the service. Where required, people received the support they needed with nutrition and hydration. People’s records showed that capacity assessments had been completed where required in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

People’s relatives told us that staff at the service were caring and positive comments were received. People’s relatives also told us that staff were responsive to people’s needs and we saw that care records were personalised. There were systems in place to review people’s records and people’s feedback was sought. There was a complaints procedure for people to use if required.

The provider had systems to communicate with staff and there were systems that monitored the quality of care provided. The provider sent a newsletter to people to communicate key messages. The provider returned the Provider Information Return (PIR) we requested was completed within the specified time frame.

We found one breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.