26 November 2014
During a routine inspection
Is the service safe?
Individualised treatment plans were developed following individual consultation. There were detailed assessments of people's care and treatment needs, with an emphasis on the identification of specific risks to their health and welfare. We also saw that systems were in place for the recruitment and selection of qualified and skilled staff with appropriate checks in place.
Is the service effective?
The service ensured that the information given to people with regard to treatment options was up to date and relevant. At the time of our visit we saw that the medical director was being appraised by the Independent Doctors Federation, following a framework laid down by the General Medical Council (GMC). One person using the service told us "The treatment is really good. Staff are great.They help me to make my own decisions and are very knowledgeable."
Is the service caring?
People we spoke with were positive about the advice they received from staff. We saw that people were treated with dignity and respect and they were involved in decisions about their treatment options.
Is the service responsive?
We saw that people's preferences were taken into account when planning their treatment. This included assessing people's needs based on their choices and developing individualised treatment plans to meet those needs. We saw that people were referred to other external professionals when required.
Is the service well-led?
Policy and quality audits were not up to date. A new management structure was in place at the time of our visit and we saw evidence of plans in place to address issues in relation to assessing and monitoring the quality of the service. Staff we spoke with told us that the management of the service was approachable and they felt listened to.