• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: The Grange

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

162 Sutton Park Road, Kidderminster, Worcestershire, DY11 6LF (01562) 756820

Provided and run by:
Worcestershire County Council

All Inspections

19 September 2017

During a routine inspection

The Grange provides accommodation with personal care for up to 34 people. People usually came to the Grange for rehabilitation direct from hospital in order to regain skills such as improvement in their mobility before returning to their own home or to alternative accommodation. People’s stay at The Grange was up to a maximum of four weeks. At the time of our inspection 18 people were living at the home. At the last inspection in June 2015 the service was rated Good.

There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection although they were not present at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People who needed assistance with the administration of their medicines told us they received these as prescribed and when needed. However medicines which required specific storage arrangements were not stored correctly.

People told us they felt safe living at the home and liked and related well with the staff who were supporting them. Staff knew how to keep people safe and whom to report any concerns about people’s safety to. People felt there were sufficient staff available to meet their needs and confirmed the staff on duty were consistent and known to them. Risks to people were assessed and known to staff. Accidents and incidents were reviewed and analysed to identify any trends.

The care people received was carried out by staff who received regular training and support to enable them to do their job. Staff felt supported and enjoyed the work they were employed to do. Staff told us they were well supported by the management. Management were available to offer guidance to staff and assisted in the provision of care as needed.

People told us they were consulted about their care and support. People were not restricted and staff had awareness about the importance of this. Most people were complimentary about the food provided and confirmed special diets were catered for and a choice available to them.

People felt staff responded to them as needed although there were times when improvements were identified as needed during the inspection. Records completed by staff did not always reflect drinks people had received to meet their personal needs. People felt confident to make complaints in the event of them needing to do so.

People were supported within the home by healthcare professionals to assist in their rehabilitation to return home or move to alternative care locations. People’s healthcare needs were met with the support of other healthcare professionals as needed.

People were involved in making plans about their care at the home and when they returned home. People were aware the time they were able to spend at the home was limited while they received rehabilitation. Although people received exercises to help with their mobility they told us they had little to do throughout the day other than watch television and talk with others.

The views of people were sought once they had left the home and returned to their own property or moved to another care home.

3 August 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection was unannounced and took place on 3 August 2015.

The provider registered with us to provide personal care and support for people in a rehabilitation setting. At the time of our inspection there were 33 people using the service.

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People who used this service were safe as the provider, registered manager and care staff had a clear understanding of the risks associated with supporting and caring for people’s needs.

Checks had been performed to make sure staff were suitable to work at the service and training provided for staff to meet the needs of people they cared for. Staff had undergone an induction training programme to prepare them before supporting people. Staff confirmed they had received support to discuss their performance, training and development needs.

We found that people were complimentary about the care they received. People’s support was carefully assessed and planned involving a number of different health and social care professionals. People told us they were consulted and involved with their care plans. Consent was sought by staff.to ensure people’s choices and preferences were taken into account. Where people did not have capacity to consent the provider followed the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Staff and management were responsive to people’s changing needs and requirements, acting promptly to assist in their rehabilitation.

People told us they knew how to make a complaint and any concerns were taken seriously and dealt with promptly according to the provider’s complaints procedures and policy. Systems were in place to monitor the quality of the service, any shortfalls identified were dealt with efficiently and quickly.

The management team encouraged staff to feel supported in their role and be open to suggestions for the development of the service or raise concerns.

There were quality audit systems in place that recorded incidents and actions taken so future learning could take place. Leadership of the service was transparent at all levels and there was a commitment from management and staff to get the best outcomes for people who used the service.

13 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We inspected The Grange and spoke with six people who lived at the home. We spoke with three members of staff on duty, the deputy manager and the registered manager. We spent time and observed the care and support people received.

We read care records for three people and other supporting documents for the service. We saw that people were respected by staff. Staff asked people if they were happy with them giving care before they gave it.

People's needs had been assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual care plan. We saw that staff were aware of each person's needs and how to give care and support to meet those needs. One person told us that: 'Staff are really good here, they really help me to get better'. We saw that staff were kind and caring in their approach to people who lived at the home.

The deputy manager showed us around the home. People told us: 'I am extremely happy here and I feel safe". Another person told us: 'I am happy with what they do here. I can do more for myself now".

There was a complaints procedure in place at the home. The registered manager told us this procedure would be followed in the event people had any comments or complaints. We found staff knew how to support people to make a complaint if they needed to. One person told us they would: 'Talk to the staff if I have any worries'. 'I don't have any complaints about this place, they are all excellent'.

25 February 2013

During a routine inspection

During our inspection we spent time with people who used the service and observed how care was provided for the people who lived at the home. We spoke with some people who lived at the home, the registered manager, the area manager, the deputy manager and four members of staff.

We saw that staff treated people with dignity and respect. We saw that staff were friendly and supportive to people and helped them to make everyday decisions.

People's needs had been assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual care plan. Staff were aware of each person's needs and how to give care and support to meet those needs so that people's health and welfare were ensured.

People we spoke with told us they were: "Well looked after" by the staff and that staff were: "Caring and helpful".

Recruitment procedures made sure that suitable staff were employed to work in the home, to safeguard people from the risk of harm.

A quality assurance system was in place that took account of people's views and experiences of the service to improve services provided.