• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: 2a Oxford Gardens

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

2A Oxford Gardens, London, N21 2AP (020) 7226 8989

Provided and run by:
Hillgreen Care Limited

All Inspections

23 August 2016

During a routine inspection

2a Oxford Gardens provides accommodation and personal care for up to three adults with learning difficulties. On the day of the inspection there were two people living at the service.

This unannounced comprehensive inspection took place on 23, 24 and 26 August 2016. At the last focused inspection on 11 December 2015, we found that the service was in continued breach of Regulation 17 and in breach of Regulation 18 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. The breaches related to ineffective audit systems which although identified issues around health and safety, did not evidence what actions had been taken to resolve those issues. We also found that there was a lack of staff supervisions and annual appraisals. Requirement notices were issued in relation to these breaches for the provider to make improvements in these areas. As part of this inspection we looked at the breaches that were identified at the last focused inspection to check what improvements had been made.

At the last focused inspection the service was not carrying out supervisions and annual appraisals in accordance with their own policy and procedures. During this inspection we found that all staff were receiving regular supervision and had received an annual appraisal. Care staff that we spoke with also confirmed this.

At the last focused inspection in December 2015, we highlighted to the provider that the freezer that was in use in the garage was in a poor state of repair. The drawers were broken and there was a large build-up of ice. During this inspection we found that the provider had still not addressed this issue. The freezer remained in a poor state with mould evident on the seals of the freezer door. We showed this to the manager during the inspection.

At the time of this inspection there was no registered manager for this location. The provider had arranged for their service manager, who oversees all Hillgreen Care Ltd homes, to take up the manager’s position on a temporary basis. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Each person living at the service had a care plan in place. These contained information and some guidance on how people wished to be supported. Risk assessments were available for each person which focused on the activities that each attended and the risks associated with those activities. However, the service did not assess any risks associated with people’s health and mental health conditions. As a result there was little or no guidance available to staff on how to reduce or mitigate risks to ensure people were kept safe from harm.

Care plans were not person centred and did not provide any background information about the person, their health and mental health condition and how they should be supported in relation to these. There was little or no information about how the person’s mental health or learning disabilities that affected their behaviour or mood. Where a person was observed to have behaviours that were challenging there was again none or very little information about the triggers that may escalate a person’s behaviour and the techniques that care staff could use to de-escalate behaviours that may challenge.

The provider, together with other registered managers from the provider’s other locations, completed monthly quality assurance inspections within the home. However, these audits were ineffective and did not highlight any of the issues that we identified as part of our inspection process. Where issues were identified, there was no action plans or systems in place in order to deal with those issues and resolve them.

People told us that they were happy living at 2a Oxford Gardens and we observed them to be well-supported by care staff. We saw positive and friendly interactions between care staff and people. People were treated with dignity and respect.

Care staff that we spoke with demonstrated a good understanding of safeguarding and knew of the different types of abuse that may affect people. Care staff knew whom to report any concerns to and were confident that appropriate action would be taken to protect people from harm.

People were supported to have their medicines safely and on time. There were records of weekly medicine audits and staff had completed training on medicine administration. As part of the training each care staff were observed whilst administering medicine to assess their competency before being allowed to administer medicines alone.

The service followed appropriate recruitment processes to ensure that only staff suitable to work with people were employed. This included obtaining references and completing criminal record checks for each staff recruited. All staff received induction when they first started work with the service followed by regular refresher training in all mandatory topics. However, the service did not provide specialist training relating to identified health and mental health needs of the people using the service.

The manager and care staff had good knowledge of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). The service had followed the correct processes to ensure that where people were deprived of their liberty that this was done lawfully.

During the inspection we looked at the fire extinguishers within the home. We found that the last safety check carried out on the extinguishers was in 2014. We asked the manager about this who told us that checks had been completed in January 2016, however the provider could not evidence this.

At this inspection we found a continued breach of Regulation 17 and further breaches of Regulation 9 and 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Warning notices were issued on the provider in relation to Regulation 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

11 December 2015

During an inspection looking at part of the service

At the last inspection of this service on 3 July 2015 we found that the service was not following safe fire procedures where by regular fire drills were not taking place. We also found that people who use the service were not protected against the risks associated with maintaining an accurate and contemporaneous record of each person including a record of care and treatment provided. We found this to be in breach of Regulation 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Requirement notices were issued in relation to these for the provider to make improvements in these areas. Other concerns were noted and highlighted to the provider at the time of the last inspection details of which can be found further on within the report.

After the inspection in July 2015, the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet the legal requirements for the breaches we found. The provider confirmed that a fire, health and safety file was in place and that regular fire drills and checks were taking place. They also confirmed that regular provider visits were taking place and issues raised from these visits were being followed up to ensure that action was taken.

We undertook this unannounced focused inspection on 11 December 2015 to check that the breaches found in relation to Regulation 12 and 17, concerning fire safety management and maintaining and reviewing people’s contemporaneous records had been addressed. During this inspection we also looked at some of the concerns that were raised during the last inspection to check that the provider had made the necessary improvements that were highlighted. In addition to this, due to recent concerns that had been raised by the local authority, we also looked at recruitment processes, how staff are supported and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 specifically in relation to the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

2a Oxford Gardens provides accommodation and personal care for up to three young adults with learning disabilities. On the day of the focused inspection there was one person living at the service.

At the time of this focused inspection there was a new manager in post who had not yet applied to be the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. We were informed at the end of the inspection that the manager had resigned.

During the inspection we saw that the provider continued to carry out registered provider audits on a monthly basis. These audits did identify issues. However, the provider was not able to demonstrate that they were checking the audits and that actions were being followed up.

During this inspection we found that the legal requirements as per Regulation 12 had been met.

However, we found there to be a continued breach of Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 and in addition to this we also found a breach in Regulation 18 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

This report only covers our findings in relation to the above requirements and concerns. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Hillgreen Care Limited – 2a Oxford Gardens on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

3 July 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 3 July 2015 and was unannounced. This was the first inspection of this service since it was registered with the Care Quality Commission in October 2014.

2a Oxford Gardens is a service that provides accommodation and care to a maximum of three people who have a learning disability. On the day of the inspection there were 2 people residing at the home.

The service did not have a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The service is required by law to have a registered manager. Because the manager was not registered with us at the time of the inspection we have rated the Well-Led section as “requires improvement”.

People told us they felt safe at the home and safe with the staff who supported them. They told us that staff were kind and respectful and that there were enough staff to support them safely.

Fire procedures were not always being followed properly.

The manager and staff at the home had identified and highlighted potential risks to people’s individual safety and had thought about and recorded how these risks could be reduced.

Staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and told us they would presume a person could make their own decisions about their care and treatment in the first instance. Staff told us it was not right to make choices for people when they could make choices for themselves.

People had access to healthcare professionals such as doctors, dentists, chiropodists and opticians.

People told us staff listened to them and respected their choices and decisions.

Care plans did not always include up to date information about all aspects of people’s care needs and some care needs were not being reviewed. Although staff had a good understanding of people they supported, we saw conflicting written information about people’s cultural requirements.

Although visits and audits were being undertaken by the provider, these were not always effective and important issues were not being addressed in a timely manner.

We found breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. These breaches were in relation to fire safety and monitoring the safety of service provision. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.