• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: 851 Brighton Road

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

851 Brighton Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2BL (020) 8763 0062

Provided and run by:
Mrs Alice Manteaw-Dankyi

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

1 and 2 December 2014

During a routine inspection

We visited 851 Brighton Road on 1 and 2 December 2014. The inspection was unannounced. The service provides rehabilitation care for up to six female adults recovering from mental disorder.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People at the service felt safe and happy. Staff knew how to recognise and respond to abuse and had completed safeguarding of vulnerable adults training. They knew how to report safeguarding incidents and escalate any concerns if necessary. People were confident they could speak to staff and the manager if they had any concerns. Accidents and incidents were reported appropriately. The buildings and external areas were well-maintained and provided a safe environment for people, staff and visitors. People’s needs were assessed and corresponding risk assessments were developed. There were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people’s needs. People’s medicines were administered safely.

Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment. Mental capacity assessments had been completed to establish each person’s capacity to make decisions and consent to care and treatment. Where people were detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) they had been informed about their legal status and rights. The manager and staff were aware of the Deprivation of Liberties Safeguards (DoLS) and people not subject to the MHA were assessed and where appropriate an application had been made for DoLS authority. People were supported to have a healthy diet and to maintain good health.

People commented positively about their relationships with staff. They were supported to express their views and were involved in making decisions about their care and treatment. Keyworkers provided additional support for people. There were community meetings every other week where people could express their views and opinions about the day to day running of the home. Staff respected people’s privacy and dignity and helped them to be more independent.

People received personalised care. Care plans were person centred and addressed a wide range of needs. People were involved in the development of their care and treatment. Care plans and associated risk assessments reflected their needs and preferences. Ward rounds took place every other week to review care and treatment. People were encouraged to take part in activities to build their confidence and independence. People were confident that they could raise concerns with staff and the manager and those concerns would be addressed.

Staff spoke positively about the service and the manager. Staff meetings were held once a month and included discussions about and learning from incidents. There was a system of regular audits that monitored and assessed the quality of service provision.

14 November 2013

During a routine inspection

During the inspection we spoke with a nurse in charge of the home, a member of staff and the acting manager who also managed another care home run by the provider. We also spoke with the provider on the telephone.

We spoke with two people using the service. They told us that staff respected their privacy and dignity. One person said 'The staff are okay, there is always someone around when you need them. The other person said 'The staff are here very caring, it's better than the hospital. The place is always nice and clean and the food is okay'.

Both said they had care plans and had been involved in planning their care. They said they received good support from staff to help them with what they needed.

They told us staff supported them to take their medications and one person told us staff reminded them when they needed to attend health care appointments.

They said if they had any concerns they would tell staff or the manager and they would do something about it.

At the time of our inspection the provider did not have a registered manager in post. The provider was in the process of recruiting a new manager and applying to the Care Quality Commission to register them to run the home.

5, 12 March 2013

During a routine inspection

During our visit we spoke with four people and overall they expressed satisfaction with the care and treatment provided.

They made positive comments about the staff and life at 851 Brighton Road. People said to us, "I really like it here," and, "No complaints whatsoever."

We observed staff talking to people in a friendly and inclusive manner. We saw that staff respected people's privacy and dignity.

We found that staff needed more support with training to provide appropriate care. The provider had systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of service provided.

We also found that the service had been operating without a registered manager and had failed to notify the Care Quality Commission.