• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Wrekin Care Co-operative

Ketley Business Park, Unit 6B, Ketley, Telford, Shropshire, TF1 5JD (01952) 249414

Provided and run by:
Wrekin Care Co-operative Limited

All Inspections

13 May 2014

During a routine inspection

The manager of Wrekin Care Co-operative had submitted an application for registered manager status. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service and shares the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law with the provider.

A single inspector carried out this inspection. The focus of the inspection was to answer five key questions; is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary describes what people using the service, their relatives and the staff told us, what we observed and the records we looked at.

If you want to see the evidence that supports our summary please read the full report.

This is a summary of what we found:

Is the service safe?

All the people we spoke with told us they felt safe when care staff were in their homes. One person spoke about the care staff and told us, 'They are well trained and know what they're doing'.

We found there were sufficient numbers of care staff to meet people's needs on the day of our inspection. The provider had arrangements in place for when staff and the manager were ill or on holiday.

Risks to people and care staff had been identified and managed in a way that ensured their safety. Risks were also identified in people's own homes which helped to ensure their safety and the safety of care staff.

The Care Quality Commission is required by law to monitor the use of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. People who used the service were all able to make their own decisions. Staff had received training in the Mental Capacity Act and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and understood the importance of people being supported to make their own decisions in relation to their care and treatment.

Is the service effective?

People told us they were happy with the care they received and that their needs were met by care staff. When we spoke with care staff they were able to tell us the care and support people needed which showed they understood their needs.

People were looked after by care staff who had received training appropriate to their roles. New care staff completed an induction phase and worked with other care staff before they worked alone with people. This ensured they were familiar with people's needs and could support them safely.

Care staff were supported in their roles through supervision with the manager. Some care staff we spoke with were unsure about the arrangements for their supervisions. However, all care staff told us they felt supported in their roles.

Is the service caring?

When we spoke with one person about the care they received from care staff, they told us, 'They are a nice crowd. They really do care'. One relative told us, 'They're helpful, respectful and we're very happy with them'.

Care staff we spoke with told us, 'I listen to what people need and want'. Another told us, 'I love my job. I get a good sense of satisfaction from it'.

Is the service responsive?

One relative told us, 'When I needed extra care calls for Mum they obliged. They've never let us down.'

People's needs were assessed before care was provided. If people's needs changed the service responded quickly and updated care plans to reflect the changes. People told us they were always involved in their own care and support.

Care staff were provided with up to date information about the people they cared for. This ensured they supported them appropriately and according to their current needs.

Is the service well led?

When we spoke with care staff they told us that the people who used the service always come first and this was something the provider insisted on. One care staff told us, 'The philosophy is all about looking after people and that they're the most important thing'.

Care staff told us they were able to speak with the manager about any concerns they had. They felt they were treated fairly and supported by them.

People completed yearly questionnaires to give their opinions on the service provided. The results from these questionnaires were shared with people. The manager told us they had spoken with individual people where they had identified issues to help resolve these. This helped to ensure that people received a good quality service at all times.

10 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We had telephone discussions with three people who used the service, five relatives one social care professional and eight members of staff to ask their views on the quality of the service that the agency provided. We also spoke with the registered manager for the agency.

Everyone we spoke with told us that they were satisfied with the care and support that they received. One person commented, 'We could not ask for any better carers." 'Another told us, 'I have already recommended Wrekin Care Co-Operative to people in similar situations as mine."

We found that the right people had been involved in making decisions about care and support. People told us that they were always asked their agreement in relation to how they received their care and support at the start of every care visit. People said that staff knew how to meet their needs and listened to them when they asked for things to be done differently.

People were protected because staff were confident to recognise and report abuse.

Staff recruitment systems made sure anyone who worked for Wrekin Care Cooperative was screened fit to have contact with vulnerable people. Staff told us they thought the range of training and development opportunities offered to them kept them up-to-date with current practice. One person commented, "We are always being offered training. It's great."

We found that the provider was continuing to develop and improve their systems for assessing and monitoring the quality of service they provided. We saw they demonstrated how they learned from feedback to show the service was run for the benefit of the people using it.

15 May 2012

During a routine inspection

We carried out this review to check on the care and welfare of people using this service and to monitor the continual improvements made by the agency since our last visit.

At our inspection visit we were informed that Wrekin Care Cooperative actively provided a personal care and support service for 62 people with a variety of needs.

We had telephone discussions with five people who used the service, two relatives

and six staff to ask their views on the quality of the service that the agency provided. We spoke with the Registered Manager for the agency and two of its board members of on the day of our visit to the office. We also had contact with a community health professional who is closely involved with the care of some of the people this agency supports.

We reviewed care and staff files and looked at systems in place for monitoring

contact with the people who received a service.

Everyone we spoke with told us that they were satisfied with the care and support that they received. One person commented,' If it was not for the excellent carers I would feel lost and have no support'. Another told us 'I am well happy. I know I am fussy but I have no cause for complaint.'

People told us that they felt involved and consulted in relation to how they received their support. People said that staff knew how to meet their needs and listened to them when they asked for things to be done differently.

People told us that the consistency in care provided by the agency was one of the

strengths of the service provided.

People were protected because staff were confident to recognise and report abuse.

People told us that staff were flexible, caring and responsive. Everyone told us that they thought staff were well trained. These comments reflected what the care workers told us. They informed us they were confident that people's needs were understood and managed appropriately as they had received the right training opportunities and felt supported enough to do a good job.

We were told that the agency regularly asked people if they were happy with the service they received. Everyone said that they would contact the office if they had any worries or concerns. People said that the Registered Manager was easy to talk to, listened to them and acted upon comments they made to improve their service.

The agency had effective systems in place to monitor the quality of the service provided which enabled the Registered Manager to demonstrate that the agency had responded positively when issues had been identified.