• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Carewatch (Westminster, Kensington & Chelsea, Hammersmith & Fulham, Wandsworth, Lambeth)

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

14 Ivor Place, London, NW1 6HS (020) 7723 7656

Provided and run by:
Graham Home Care Limited

All Inspections

23 January 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 23 January 2015 and was unannounced. Carewatch (Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea, Hammersmith and Fulham, Wandsworth, Lambeth) is a domiciliary care

agency providing care to adults living in their own homes within the London boroughs of Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea, Hammersmith and Fulham, Wandsworth and Lambeth. 298 people were using the service at the time of our visit.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People’s views about the service were mostly positive though we heard complaints about staff arriving late or not at all to scheduled visits. Relatives and representatives of people using the service told us they thought the service was at times poorly managed but that staff were doing their best.

The service received referrals via email or telephone from social workers based in and around the local community. An initial assessment process was carried out by senior staff to ensure people’s care needs could be met before a package of care was organised and care staff allocated.

Care plans were developed in consultation with people and their family members. Where people were unable to contribute to the care planning process, staff worked with people’s relatives and representatives and sought the advice of health and social care professionals to assess the care needed.

People’s risk assessments were completed and these covered a range of issues including personal care, falls prevention and guidance around moving and positioning. Staff had guidance about how to support people with known healthcare needs, such as when a person needed support with mobility equipment such as hoists and wheelchairs.

Most staff were familiar with the provider’s safeguarding policies and procedures and able to describe the actions they would take to keep people safe. There were protocols in place to respond to any medical emergencies or significant changes in a person’s well-being. These included contacting people’s GPs, social workers and family members for additional advice and information.

Staff were required to support people to complete shopping tasks and prepare simple meals. Staff were aware of people’s specific dietary needs and preferences and offered people choices at mealtimes. Where people were not able to communicate their likes and/or dislikes, staff sought advice and guidance from family members.

People’s independence was promoted and staff were able to explain how they respected people’s privacy and dignity. Staff understood the importance of gaining consent from people before they undertook personal care tasks.

There were arrangements in place to assess and monitor the quality and effectiveness of the service but staff were not always following the provider’s policies and procedures in regards to the logging and reporting of complaints and safeguarding matters.

We found breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010 in relation to notifications, care and welfare, complaints and quality monitoring. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

22 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We sent out a survey to people who use the service and their relatives asking about the care and support they received from Carewatch to which 14 people responded. In this the majority of people indicated that they were given appropriate information about the service and that they were involved in deciding how care and support was provided. They said they were treated with respect. Carewatch conducted their own surveys. In their most recent survey results the majority of people indicated that they were given appropriate information about the service and that they were involved in decisions about what care and support was provided.

People were assessed by staff before they started using the service. They would be asked about their medical history and any medications they were taking, as well as their ability to undertake activities of daily living. Staff received training in first aid and what to do in a medical emergency. In our survey the majority of people rated the care and support that was provided as "excellent" or "good" and that they received the care and support they needed most of the time.

Medicines were safely administered and were stored in people's homes. There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs.

Senior staff conducted unannounced spot checks on individual staff members at least quarterly to ensure that individual staff were providing a good service.

14 November 2012

During a routine inspection

People using the service told us that they had choices about how they were cared for and supported. They were involved in drawing up their own care plans. Staff had been trained in assessing someone's mental capacity and knew how to report any concerns that they had.

People we spoke with described the staff as "very good" and in recent written feedback the majority of people rated the service as "excellent" or "average". Appropriate information about people's medical and social needs was taken when they first started using the service and risks assessments were undertaken to ensure people's safety.

Staff had been trained in safeguarding. They knew how to recognise signs of possible abuse and how to report any concerns (including to the local authority). People said they felt "safe" using the service.

Prior to starting to work for the service appropriate checks were made on applicants, including enhanced Criminal Records Bureau checks, checks on their right to work in the UK, and references were gained.

The provider had a complaints system which people using the service were aware of and they said would be happy to raise any concerns with staff.

In this report "Jackie Grant" is listed as being one of the registered managers of the service, though at the time of the inspection she was no longer in post and not managing the regulatory activities at this location. Their name appears because they were still a Registered Manager on our register at the time.

23 September 2011

During a routine inspection

People who use the service generally made positive comments about the service in the quality questionnaires that the agency sent to them. We did not speak directly to them.

They told us they generally felt respected, safe and were involved in daily decision-making about the care they received. They said mostly agency staff are approachable, listened to their views, acted on them and treated them with respect. Although this varied from person to person.

Some commented that the agency were in regular contact, sometimes visited them, asked them what they needed and they felt they were getting the service they wanted. They said it was regularly reviewed, updated and mostly delivered on time. Some felt the agency could improve their system for notifying any changes to the service including more notice of change of time or carer. The agency was looking into this.

They found staff generally friendly, competent and prepared to adapt their working practices to provide a good quality of service.

They were also aware of how to make a complaint and who to.