• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Mears Care - Cambridge

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Old Sunday School, Chapel Street, Waterbeach, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB25 9HR (01223) 508100

Provided and run by:
Cera Care Operations Limited

All Inspections

22, 26 and 28 October 2015

During a routine inspection

Mears Care Cambridge is an agency that provides personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection the service provided personal care to approximately 200 people living Cambridgeshire.

Our last inspection took place on 8 April 2013 we found the provider was meeting all the regulations we looked at.

The last registered manager left the service in June 2015. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The new manager took up post shortly after the registered manager left. They have significant experience of managing a similar service. Their application to register as manager was being processed by the CQC during this inspection.

Staff were only employed after the provider carried out satisfactory pre-employment checks. Staff were trained and well supported by their managers. There were sufficient staff to meet people’s assessed needs. Systems were in place to ensure people’s safety was effectively managed. Staff were aware of the procedures for reporting concerns and of how to protect people from harm.

People’s health and care needs were effectively met and staff were aware of people’s dietary needs. People received their prescribed medicines appropriately and medicines.

The CQC monitors the operations of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which applies to care services. We found people’s rights to make decisions about their care were respected.

People received care and support from staff who were kind, friendly, and efficient. People and their relatives were encouraged to express their views on the service provided.

People, and their relatives where appropriate, were involved in their care assessments and reviews. Care records were detailed and provided staff with sufficient guidance to provide consistent care to each person that met their needs. Changes to people’s care was kept under review to ensure that any changes were effective.

People and their relatives knew who they could speak with if they had a concern or complaint. A complaints procedure was in place. The manager responded appropriately to people’s concerns or complaints.

People, relatives and staff told us there had been significant improvements in the way the service was run since the new manager took up post in June 2015. People and relatives were encouraged to provide feedback on the service in various ways both formally and informally. There was an effective quality assurance system in place and the manager had clear plans for the service’ further improvement and development.

Mears Care Cambridge is an agency that provides personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection the service provided personal care to approximately 200 people living Cambridgeshire.

8 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We received mostly positive comments from the people who used the service. They told us that the agency's carers treated them respectfully, that carers stayed the full amount of time they were scheduled to, that carers telephoned if they were going to be late and that they received the same small team of carers to provide their care. One person told us, 'They (care staff) do anything I ask and are very patient'. Another person reported, 'My carer is outstanding and literally saved my life when I had a haemorrhage'. However, one family member told us, 'I really wish they could come later to help my husband to bed. They come at 7:45 pm which is far too early for him. It was meant to be 8.30pm originally but whenever I ring up I just get excuses as to why it can't be at that time'.

It was clear that the agency had experienced some difficulty recently when it had taken over a large number of care packages from two other agencies, without the appropriate number of staff and resources in place to meet this increased demand. This had badly affected its overall performance and led to many people not receiving their care as planned. As a result, we had received an increase in the numbers of complaints about the service. However, there was sufficient evidence to show that the service had significantly improved and there was now a considerable reduction in the number of complaints and missed calls.

12 April 2012

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with said they were very happy with the care they received. They told us that the carers were helpful and maintained their dignity. Comments made were, "I would highly recommend them"; "They (the care staff) are very pleasant" and "Every one of them is lovely. You can't fault any of them".

26, 27 April 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

People told us they had been involved in their plans of care and they had a folder in their home with details of the care to be provided. One person said they sometimes did not know which carer was going to provide the care but that this was not a problem. People said carers were "very helpful and friendly", "very pleasant and helpful" and "excellent". People said they knew whom to speak with if there was a problem and the relevant 'phone numbers were contained within the file they had in their home.

People we spoke with said that staff prompted them to take medication. Some people were not sure if or how this was recorded. We spoke with some family members of other people using the service who said they administered medication and the agency was not involved in that element of care.