• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Cordant Care - Stratford

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

61 Broadway, Stratford, London, E15 4BQ (020) 8503 0033

Provided and run by:
Prime Time Recruitment Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

11 December 2014

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 11 December 2014 and was announced. The provider was given 48 hours’ notice because the location provides a domiciliary care service and we needed to be sure that someone would be in. The service was last inspected on 12 December 2013 and was found to be meeting all the regulations we checked at that time.

The service provides support with personal care to adults and children living in their own homes. Sixty six people were using the service at the time of our inspection. The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe. Safeguarding procedures were in place and staff knew how to respond to allegations of abuse. Risk assessments were in place which provided information about how to reduce the risks people faced, including risks associated with behaviours that challenged the service. There were enough staff to meet people’s assessed needs and robust staff recruitment procedures were in place. Medicines were administered in a safe way.

Although staff undertook regular training and were provided with supervision from senior staff they did not always have an annual appraisal of their performance and development needs. We recommend that all care staff receive an annual appraisal of their performance and development needs to help support them to develop their knowledge, skills and understanding.

People told us they were able to make choices about their care and staff sought consent from people before providing personal care. People were supported to eat and drink in a safe manner. The service worked with other care providers to help meet people’s needs.

People told us they were treated with dignity and respect. The service sought to meet people’s needs in relation to equality and diversity issues.

The service carried out assessments of people’s needs to determine if they could be met before they commenced providing care. Care plans were in place which set out people’s support needs and staff had a good understanding of the needs of the people they worked with. People told us care was provided in a personalised manner. There were effective systems in place for dealing with complaints.

There was a clear management structure in place and staff told us that senior staff were approachable and helpful. The service had various quality assurance and monitoring systems in place. Some of these included seeking the views of people that used the service.

12 December 2013

During a routine inspection

The registered manager told us that staff at the service followed the organisation's consent policy. We were shown the policy which was up to date and had been reviewed in May 2013. This provided guidance to staff in relation to obtaining people's consent for delivering care. One relative we spoke to told us "staff always involve me in decisions about my son's care."

Staff told us that when people made enquiries about the service or were referred to the service they conducted an initial assessment of their needs. The registered manager told us that this was done in order to ensure that the service was able to adequately meet the person's needs and care for them safely.

The registered manager told us that medicines management was included in the staff induction and annual training programme. Two staff we spoke to told us that they had received training in the administration of medicine and we saw up to date staff files which confirmed this.

We were told no agency staff were used and the service had access to their own staff if there was a change in circumstances such as staff sickness or annual leave. One relative we spoke to told us "they arranged the cover for annual leave of the regular carer well with a good handover between staff."

We saw that reviews of people's needs were documented and found that the information recorded provided a detailed summary of each person, the care delivered and any measures taken by staff to ensure their health and safety.

4 January 2013

During a routine inspection

On the day of the inspection we spoke to five family members as some people were children and others were unable to tell us their experiences.

All the family members spoke very positively about the service. One family member said "I'm delighted with the progress made, they have changed our lives." Another family member told us the care was exceptional and that the provider understood all of the issues.

We saw that the provider involved people and their families from the outset of receiving care and maintained contact to see how the care was progressing. We saw that care plan and risk assessment reviews happened on time and the care was person centred with the aim of setting goals and maintaining independence and/or improving people's quality of life.

Staff were supported at the service and received thorough induction, training and supervision.