Archived: The Priory Hospital Widnes

Bennetts Lane, Widnes, Cheshire, WA8 0GT (0151) 422 2140

Provided and run by:
Revona LLP t/a Hanover Healthcare Limited

All Inspections

8 August 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This was an unannounced visit to the service.

We did not speak to patients directly during our visit as Commissioners visiting on the same day had spoken to patients as part of their review process.

The commissioners informed us that each patient had an activity programme, although several service users said they were occupied one patient said they were bored for long periods. The commissioners also found that there was minimal evidence of outcomes recorded from activities.

Feedback was shared with senior hospital managers of the Priory Group on conclusion of our visit.

We raised serious concerns relating to the care and welfare of patients and the management of safeguarding incidents.

During the course of the visit powers were used under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 to obtain documentary evidence to support the inspection.

We had also met with NHS specialist commissioners during our visit who shared some similar concerns in standards at the service that needed improvement.

We also received information from the local authority regarding their summary of safeguarding investigations were they raised concerns about the management of safeguarding incidents.

25 May 2012

During an inspection in response to concerns

This was an unannounced visit to the service covering two days. On the first day of the visit two compliance inspectors were accompanied by a Mental Health Act Commissioner; an expert by experience who is an experienced lay person who has expertise in this type of setting and a Care Quality Commission pharmacist. On day two the compliance inspector was accompanied by a Mental Health Act Commissioner.

Feedback was shared with senior hospital managers of the Priory Group including their regional operations director on conclusion of our visit. We raised serious concerns relating to the practice and management of seclusion at the hospital during day one and advised that our concerns would be referred to Halton social services and the NHS commissioners.

During the course of the visit powers were used under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 to obtain documentary evidence to support the inspection.

We encouraged the patients we met to participate in the visit and we met six patients who received support from the service.

We had mixed comments and opinions from patients about their stay at the hospital, such as;

One patient told us they had not been involved in looking at their care plan and had not been involved in giving their opinion about their care and placement at the Priory.

Some patients told us they didn't have much to do and limited access for activities, some said that trips out were sometimes cancelled. The kitchen on Beech unit had been changed into a laundry and they were unable to do cooking on the ward.

One patient said she spent her day playing on her computer game and watching television.

Another patient felt there were insufficient staff to talk to because they were involved in carrying out other activities such as monitoring patients or involved in seclusion.

One patient was very positive about staff and their rehabilitation. They were looking forward to going home later in the day.

One patient told us they were restricted in when they could have a cigarette and had not received any information about certain routines and practices.

Patients told us they did not always know why they were in hospital or in seclusion.

One patient had asked for a social worker but did not know when they would get to see one.

We also contacted the NHS specialist commissioners for the north west before our visit in March who shared some concerns in standards at the service that needed improvement.

We received an anonymous concern regarding services at the hospital prior to our unannounced visit on day one and due to the nature of the allegations we referred them to Halton social services and the NHS North West commissioners.

6 December 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During our last visit of the service in August 2011, we spoke to patients who did not express any negative concerns about the service they received. This visit did not gain the views of patients given that this visit was primarily to assess progress that had been made by the service in being compliant with essential standards and as a result improving the experiences of those who used the service at the Priory Hospital.

25 August and 14 December 2011

During a routine inspection

We visited the Priory Hospital on 25th August 2011 to assess compliance with a number of essential standards. As part of that process, we interviewed two patients who were using the service. One person confirmed that they were asked about the treatment they received 'all the time' and gave an account of their daily life within the service. They stated that they felt safe and had a good relationship with the individual overseeing their treatment. The other patient did not give specific comments about the service but did indicate a concern they had about the occupancy of the ward and this was referred onto the staff team. The other person had concerns about the visiting arrangements within the service and this was referred to a social worker.

We conducted the visit with a Mental Health Act Commissioner who has specific responsibilities to ensure that the service is compliant with the Mental Health Act. Compliance with this is subject to a separate report between the Commissioner and the service.

On the day of the visit, the Regional manager of the Service provided us with an audit of the service that had been conducted prior to our visit. As the Priory Group have recently acquired this Hospital, they implement such an audit as part of the acquisition process and were very open regarding its content. The audit was linked to each of the essential standards of quality and safety that is used to examine compliance. The audit indicated that generally the service was non compliant with essential standards and these are outlined in this report.

Mental Health Act Commissioner reports

Each year, we visit all NHS trusts and independent providers who care for people whose rights are restricted under the Mental Health Act to monitor the care they provide and check that patients' rights are met. Immediate concerns raised by patients on those visits are discussed, if appropriate, with hospital staff.

Our Mental Health Act Commissioners may carry out a number of visits to each provider over a 12-month period, during which they talk to detained patients, staff and managers about how services are provided. In the past, we summarised themes from the visits and published an annual statement followed by the provider's response where applicable. We are looking at different ways to indicate the outcomes of our monitoring in the future.