• Mental Health
  • Independent mental health service

Archived: Harts Leap Independent Hospital

Windrush Heights, Off Harts Leap Road, Sandhurst, Berkshire, GU47 8ET (01344) 772599

Provided and run by:
Harts Leap (Sandhurst) Limited

All Inspections

1 July 2013

During a routine inspection

On the day of the inspection the registered manager told us that there were 21 people accommodated at the hospital and that they had stopped admitting people to Wellington ward due to planned refurbishment.

We spoke with four people who were happy with the care they received. People commented “Staff treat me as an individual and do their best for me.” Another person said “Staff are good to me, they make me feel important.”

We found that people had been able to access a variety of occupational therapy activities.

People told us that they were involved in making decisions about their care and that they had been provided with a copy of their care plan.

We saw that people had been asked to sign to consent to their care and that best interest’s decisions had been made for people when they lacked mental capacity.

People’s care needs had been assessed and regularly reviewed.

Staff had received safeguarding training and information about safeguarding was available to people.

We found that the access to the women’s bathroom facilities on Connaught ward did not conform to guidance and that the occupational therapy room was not accessible.

The first floor of Wellington ward was no longer in use due to its condition and the design of the ground floor was not suitable for the provision of people’s care. We found that this ward required both maintenance and refurbishment.

There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service provided.

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

As this was a desk top review we did not speak to people who use the service on this occasion.

We reviewed the documentary evidence that the provider produced in line with their action plan following the last inspection. We have found that the manager has taken measures to ensure that a safeguarding children policy has been implemented and that staff have received training in this area. The manager has also ensured that staff now understand that if an incident occurs between people who use the service it may be necessary to refer the incident to the local safeguarding team.

2 July 2012

During a routine inspection

Many of the people at Harts Leap Independent Hospital had complex needs and were not able to tell us about their experiences. To help us to understand the experiences of people in one ward of the hospital we used our SOFI (Short Observational Framework for Inspection) tool. The SOFI tool allowed us to spend time watching what was going on in a service and helped us to record how people spent their time, the type of support they got and whether they had positive experiences. We spent time observing care and found that people had positive experiences.

People who could express a view told us the hospital was good. They said that the staff were good, and they were encouraged and supported to do things for themselves. People told us they were encouraged to express their views and make, or participate in, making decisions related to their care and treatment.

We spoke with one relative during our visit and following the visit we spoke with three relatives by phone. They all informed us that they were consulted about their relative's care needs, as and when appropriate. They said their relatives were well cared for at Harts Leap.

One relative told us that 'he liked the fact that staff were aware that his knowledge of his relative was better than theirs and staff respected this'.

People and their relatives told us they felt able to raise any complaints and they were confident that there concerns would be responded to and dealt with quickly.

People and their relatives told us they knew the manager well and that she was always around to speak with.

29 March 2011

During a routine inspection

Most patients we spoke to said that the staff talked to them respectfully. The patients we spoke to who had capacity to consent to treatment said they understood the treatment they were being given.

Most of the patients we spoke to said they were reasonably happy with the care they were receiving and the attitude of staff. One patient told us that the hospital had improved over the past few years.

One patient told us that he had been receiving professional mental health care for over 30 years but he felt better than he had ever felt as a result of his current treatment at Harts Leap Hospital. Page 3 of 46

Two patients said there were not enough activities arranged by the hospital to keep them occupied during the day. One patient said that the activities listed to take place each day did not always take place and there was no communication from staff to advise patients they were cancelled or why they were cancelled.

Most patients said that the food served at the hospital was fine.

Most patients we spoke to during the visit said that they felt safe at Harts Leap Independent Hospital. No patients said they felt unsafe.

Patients told us that their rooms and the communal areas of the hospital were cleaned regularly.

Most patients we spoke to did not want to talk about their medication because they were detained under the Mental Health Act and said they did not have a choice about the medication they were given. Patients confirmed that they received their medication regularly.

One patient told us that the hospital premises had improved over the last year and that she now regularly saw maintenance staff on-site. Some patients said they were looking forward to the completion of the landscaping work in the garden for Wellington ward so that they could easily access the garden.

The patients we spoke to said they had no concerns about staffing.

Mental Health Act Commissioner reports

Each year, we visit all NHS trusts and independent providers who care for people whose rights are restricted under the Mental Health Act to monitor the care they provide and check that patients' rights are met. Immediate concerns raised by patients on those visits are discussed, if appropriate, with hospital staff.

Our Mental Health Act Commissioners may carry out a number of visits to each provider over a 12-month period, during which they talk to detained patients, staff and managers about how services are provided. In the past, we summarised themes from the visits and published an annual statement followed by the provider's response where applicable. We are looking at different ways to indicate the outcomes of our monitoring in the future.