• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Easington District

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Pride House, 28 Crawford Avenue, Peterlee, County Durham, SR8 5EG (0191) 518 0753

Provided and run by:
Easington District Crossroads Care Attendant Scheme

All Inspections

23 July 2015

During a routine inspection

We undertook an announced inspection of the Easington District Crossroads on 23 July 2015. We gave the provider two days notice of our visit. The Easington District Crossroads is a domiciliary care agency which provides care services to people in their own homes.

At the time of our inspection the service was providing support to three people. One person was funding their own care, one person was funding their care through a direct payment and one person had their care purchased by a local authority.

Easington District Crossroads was last inspected by CQC on 27 January 2014 and was meeting the regulations inspected.

People who used the service were not able to share their experience of care due to their complex needs. People’s relatives were complimentary about the standard of care and support provided by Easington District Crossroads. One relative told us, “It’s a fantastic service”, “I can’t fault it” and “The staff are lovely and very helpful.”

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The registered manager was accessible and approachable. Staff, people who used the service and their relatives felt able to speak with the registered manager and provided feedback on the service. The registered manager undertook monthly spot checks to review the quality of the service provided.

People were kept safe and free from harm. There were appropriate numbers of staff employed to meet people’s needs and provide a flexible service. Staff were able to accommodate last minute changes to appointments as requested by the people who used the service or their relatives.

The provider had an effective recruitment and selection procedure in place and carried out relevant checks when they employed staff. Staff were knowledgeable about their roles and responsibilities however some training was not up to date. Staff had the experience required to support people with their care and support needs.

Staff received supervision and appraisal which meant that staff were properly supported to provide care to people who used the service.

Staff knew the people they were supporting and provided a personalised service. Care plans were in place detailing how people wished to be supported and people were involved in making decisions about their care. Care plans were written in a person centred way and were reviewed annually or when people’s needs changed.

Staff supported people to help them maintain their independence. People were encouraged to care for themselves where possible. Staff treated people with dignity and respect.

15, 27 January 2014

During a routine inspection

People who use the service were not able to share with us their experience of care due to their complex care needs. We looked at three care records, spoke with two people's relatives, one person's social worker and three members of staff.

People's relatives told us they were happy with the care their relative received. One person told us 'my relative has been a client of the service since 2002 and I am very happy with the care they receive". Another person told us 'the care is excellent, my relative and the family get on very well with the care workers."

We looked at the care records of people and found there was a system in place to ensure people consented to their care. People had an assessment of their care needs before they started using the service. A care plan was then implemented to ensure staff knew how to deliver care safely and effectively.

The service had suitable staffing arrangements to ensure people's needs were met. The staff had been appropriately trained and knew how to identify and report any concerns of abuse.

Records relating to people were stored in a locked office where only people who had been authorised could access them.

11 December 2012

During a routine inspection

On the day of our inspection we visited two people who were supported by Easington District. We spent time observing how staff supported people. We found staff were very respectful in their approach, treating people with dignity and courtesy. People who used the service were very positive about the staff. Comments included 'I am happy with the service', 'They've been really good, I am very pleased with the service' and 'We have a good relationship."

People told us they could help decide how the care worker would support them. One person said 'I just tell them what I want'; another said 'We chose the type of support and they have been very good when we have needed to make changes."

We spoke with some relatives who told us they were very happy with the care and support provided. Comments included 'They have been tremendous', 'I am over the moon with them' and 'They are very sensitive to (my relative's) needs.'

People said they knew they could speak to a member of staff if they had a complaint. One person said "I've never had to complain but I would just ring the office if I needed to.'