• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Interserve Healthcare - Harrogate

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Ground Floor, 3 Devonshire Place, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, HG1 4AA (01423) 528090

Provided and run by:
Advantage Healthcare Nursing and Care Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

14 April 2015

During a routine inspection

We undertook this announced inspection on the 14 April 2015. At the previous inspection, which took place on 20 December 2013 the service met with all of the regulations we assessed.

Interserve Healthcare - Harrogate is owned by Advantage Healthcare Nursing and Care Limited. The office is close to the town centre of Harrogate. The agency is registered to provide personal care and nursing care. They employ care workers and nurses and supports people and their families who wish to live independently and/or in their own homes. At the time of our inspection 13 people were supported by Interserve Healthcare - Harrogate. The service did not have a manager currently registered with the Care Quality Commission. The service had employed a manager who had recently commenced working at the service three months prior to our inspection. The manager informed us that they had made an application to register with the Care Quality Commission. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People we spoke with said they felt safe with staff from the agency. However, people also told us they were not satisfied with the levels of staff provided from the agency with families sometimes being told they had to manage as there were gaps in the rota. We have recommended that the manager makes sure that appropriate levels of staff are provided to meet peoples needs.

Staff were recruited safely and they were trained appropriately to be able to support people.

The service had safeguarding vulnerable adult’s policies and procedures which were understood by staff. Staff received training in safeguarding vulnerable adults and all those spoken with confirmed that they would tell someone should any aspect of poor care be observed.

Staff identified and understood individual risks to people and worked with them to minimise these risks whilst also supporting them to remain as independent as possible.

People were positive about the staff who supported them. People using the service described being treated by staff from the agency with politeness and respect.

People told us they were able to make choices. Their likes, dislikes and personal preferences were recorded within their care records and were known and understood by staff.

Several people made comments to us about the agency not being very responsive. Examples people gave us were having to phone the office and ‘chase the agency’ to see if cover was arranged for gaps in the rota. They also said that the office/manager did not respond to phone calls very quickly or return calls and people felt there was little personal contact with managers and agency office staff.

Training was provided for all staff and staff said this supported them in their roles. They received appropriate induction, training, supervision and support.

Staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). DoLS are part of the MCA (Mental Capacity Act 2005) legislation which is in place for people who are unable to make decisions for themselves. The legislation is designed to ensure that any decisions are made in people’s best interests.

The agency did not have an effective quality assurance system in place which ensured that the agency could satisfy itself that it provided care to people in their own homes in a safe and effective way. We have recommended that the agency improves the quality assurance system.

The agency had received complaints and we saw that they had dealt with them appropriately. However people told us that they had not had a copy of the agencies complaints procedure, although most people told us they would not hesitate in contacting the agency if they had a complaint. We have recommended that the manager makes sure that people who use the service know how to complain.

20 December 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five members of staff and five people (person being cared for and relatives) who received a service from Advantage Healthcare.

Before people received support from Advantage Healthcare they were asked for their consent to allow staff to provide care to them or their relative.

People experienced care, treatment and support that met their needs and protected their rights. We did not observe any direct care being provided to people as care was provided in people's own homes. All the people we spoke with expressed satisfaction with the service they had received. Comments included "They are very good', 'Excellent staff' and 'The manager spends a lot of time with people before hand and spends time matching them with the right staff. I really think people receive good care.'

People who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse, because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening. The provider had policies and procedures in place for safeguarding adults and children.

Staff received appropriate professional development. We spoke with five members of staff. They told us 'I feel extremely supported' and 'We are assessed regularly to make sure we understand what we are doing.'

The provider had suitable arrangements in place to monitor the quality of service people received. Checks on the quality of the service provided were carried out by the provider, the manager and staff at Advantage Healthcare. Systems were in place to identify and manage risks to the delivery of service.

12 November 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with six people who used the service, including relatives. Everyone we spoke with told us they were satisfied with the care and support received. We saw records that showed people who used the service and their relatives were involved in developing their own plans of care. People we spoke with said they understood the care and support plans and that staff had explained things to them in detail.

People told us that staff were knowledgeable regarding their support needs. They said they were treated well. Two relatives told us that if they had a complaint they would contact the manager and they were confident it would be dealt with properly.

We looked at people's care records. We found records were accurate, up to date and regularly reviewed. We also saw how the agency included people in decision making throughout their treatment and support and worked with people, at their own pace, to make sure they knew in detail what support was needed and how best they could meet that need. We looked at staff records and found staff were well trained and saw there were good systems in place to ensure they were well supported in their work.

Staff talked positively about their work and told us they were proud of the work they did.