• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Sevacare - Lincoln

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

142 High Street, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN5 7PJ (01522) 525000

Provided and run by:
Sevacare (UK) Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

8 July 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 8 July 2015 and was announced. Sevacare Lincoln provides personal care in people’s homes to adults of all ages with a range of health care needs. There were approximately 150 people using the service at the time of the inspection and the service was providing approximately 1500 hours of care a week.

At the time of our inspection the service did not have a registered manager. The provider was in the process of making an application to the Care Quality Commission for a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People said they felt safe with the care they received. Staff had completed safeguarding training and had access to guidance. They were able to recognise if people were at risk and knew what action they should take.

People had risk assessments. Where risks had been identified there were plans to manage them

effectively. Staff understood risks to people and followed guidance. Staff were alert to changes in people’s usual presentation. They recorded incidents and reported them.

There was usually sufficient staff to provide people’s care. Recruitment checks ensured that people were protected from the risk of being cared for by unsuitable staff.

People’s care was provided by staff who were sufficiently trained and supported. Staff undertook medicines training and were observed by senior staff delivering care. Staff had received an induction when they started employment with the provider and completed further training relevant to people’s needs and were supported to undertake professional qualifications. Systems were in place to support staff and monitor their work.

The provider acted in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA), where people lacked the capacity to consent to their care relevant guidance had been followed. People told us staff treated them with dignity and respect. People’s needs in relation to nutrition and hydration were documented. Care plans were personalised and people were supported to maintain their choices. Care plans were updated.

Staff felt supported by the new leadership and the manager ensured people had information and support to make complaints. Where complaints were made they were investigated and actions taken in response.

The majority of people told us there were good communications from the office and they knew who to speak with. People’s feedback on the service was sought through reviews. Staff were encouraged to speak with the office about any concerns they had about people’s care.

11, 13 September 2013

During a routine inspection

Members of staff were able to demonstrate how principles of promoting dignity and respect applied in their work. This showed the service promoted person centred care. One person who received care told us, 'The staff are very good to me; very polite and respectful.'

People told us they were involved in creating and reviewing their care plans. One person said, 'I was involved in planning my care and we have regular discussions about it.'

People told us they were satisfied with their care. One person said, 'I have absolutely no complaints whatsoever.'

We asked people who received care whether the care worker ever missed their appointment. One said, 'I have been with them [Sevacare] for a year now and they have never missed' whilst another commented, 'No, they have never not come.'

Records showed some people had, over the last year, complained about the lack of continuity of care staff. One person who received care told us, 'We used to get quite a lot of different carers but now it seems to have settled down and we get the same people, unless they are off for some reason.'

5 December 2012

During a routine inspection

One person commented on how satisfied they were with the support provided. They told us the agency was reliable and care workers were punctual. People reported care workers promoted their dignity and responded to their individual needs and wishes. One person commented, "The care provided is very, very good.'

People we spoke with had confidence in their care workers and felt that the care they were given was consistent whoever visited them.

Care plans were written in a way that promoted the individual's choice and independence. They gave clear guidance for care workers on how the care and support should be given. We noted care plans were reviewed regularly.

The care workers we spoke with all demonstrated understanding of the care planning process and of individual's needs.

7 February 2012

During a routine inspection

The people we spoke with said they were happy with the care and support they received and felt it was delivered in a safe way. They told us that staff offered them choice and respected their opinions while helping them to be as independent as possible. One person commented, 'They respect my preferances, I just ask and they oblige.'

People told us their needs were being met by staff who were competent, friendly and caring. One person said, 'They are wonderful, very kind and understanding, and helpful.' Another person commented, 'I have the same girls all the time, they do a good job and they keep to the arranged times.' A relative we spoke with said, 'The regular ladies are wonderful we couldn't wish for anything more.'

The people we spoke with told us they did not have any complaints about the way they were supported. They said they would feel confident raising any concerns they might have with the care workers or the office staff. One person said, 'On the odd occasion I have had to phone the office they have always sorted things out quickly.' Another person told us, 'I am very, very happy with the care and support I receive.'

When we asked if there was anything people would like to improve no-one could think of anything they wanted to change. A relative said, 'On the whole we are very pleased with all the carers and people at the office.' Another person said,' They can't improve as far as I am concerned.'