• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Forest Court Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Bradley Court Road, Mitcheldean, Gloucestershire, GL17 0DR (01989) 750775

Provided and run by:
Bupa Care Homes (CFChomes) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

27 September 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on the 27 and 28 September 2016 and was unannounced. The home was last inspected on 24 October 2013 and met all the legal requirements assessed at that time.

This service specialises in dementia care and can provide this to a maximum of 40 people.

Forest Court Care Home had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We received positive feedback from health and social care professionals, such as “I have seen them deliver some very good person centred dementia care which has enhanced the lives of the residents over the years that I have been visiting”.

People were at risk of receiving care from unsuitable staff because robust recruitment procedures were not always being applied. Medicines were generally managed safely although attention had not been given to some aspects of medicine storage.

Sufficient staffing levels were maintained and staff were supported through training and supervision to maintain their skills and knowledge to care for people living with dementia. Risks to people’s safety were identified, assessed and appropriate action taken. People had positive relationships with the staff team.

People were treated with respect and kindness and their privacy and dignity was upheld, they were supported to maintain their independence as much as possible. People and their representatives were involved in the planning and review of their care and people took part in a range of activities.

Staff received support to develop knowledge and skills for their role and were positive about their work with people. The registered manager was accessible to people using the service and staff. Systems were in place to check the quality of the service provided including surveys to gain the views of people and their relatives.

24 October 2013

During a routine inspection

During this inspection we met several people who used the service but they were unable to tell us about their experiences. We therefore gathered evidence about these by talking with relatives, talking with staff and inspecting relevant records within the service. We found there were arrangements in place to support people to make choices and to acknowledge and aim to meet people's specific and individual preferences. We found that people's needs had been met and that staff had a good understanding of people's diversity and human rights. One relative said "The care is very good and I have never had concerns about this".

There were safe arrangements in place with regard to medicines. People were cared for in a clean environment and there were good systems in place to prevent the spread of infection. Staff were recruited in a robust manner to ensure people who used the service were protected. There was a good mix of qualified and experienced staff to ensure people's needs were met and to support less experienced staff.

Arrangements were in place to acknowledge, investigate and respond to people's concerns or complaints.

18 December 2012

During a routine inspection

The care home specialised in the care of people with dementia and other illnesses where people's mental health and mental capacity was compromised. People were therefore unable to give us clear views of their experiences so we gathered evidence about these through using other methods. This included the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI).

We were able to evidence that the correct processes under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 were being used to protect people who lacked mental capacity. We saw that people were being cared for by staff who were skilled in meeting their specific needs and who adapted their time and practices to fit in with those needs. There were arrangements in place to ensure risks to people were managed effectively. This included robust arrangements to protect people from potential abuse.

The environment had been adapted and people had benefitted from these adaptations.

There were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs and to support the care homes needs generally.

There were effective monitoring systems in place to ensure people were provided with a service that was safe and met their needs.