• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Birwood

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

19 Wheathill Road, Huyton, Knowsley, Merseyside, L36 5UR (0151) 449 3758

Provided and run by:
Community Integrated Care

All Inspections

To Be Confirmed

During a routine inspection

This was an unannounced inspection, carried out on 11 June 2015.

Birwood is a care home providing personal care for three adults with learning disabilities. The service is operated by Community Integrated Care. The property has three bedrooms, a lounge, a kitchen with dining area and a small room which is used as an office. There are gardens to the front and rear of the property. At the time of our inspection there were 3 people using the service.

The service does not have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The last inspection of Birwood was carried out in April 2014 and we found that the service was not meeting all the regulations we assessed. The provider sent us an action plan outlining how and when they intended to meet the regulations. During this inspection we found that the required improvements had been made within the timescale set by the provider.

Improvements had been made to ensure people had access meaningful activities both at home and in the local community. People were supported to access a range of activities and events which they enjoyed.

People were safe and staff treated them well. Staff knew what their responsibilities were for protecting people from abuse and for reporting any concerns they had about people’s safety.

People’s needs were assessed and planned for and staff had information about how to meet people’s needs. People’s wishes and preferences and their preferred method of communication were reflected in the care plans. Daily records which were maintained for each person showed they had received the right care and support. Care plans were regularly reviewed and updated to ensure they remained up to date.

Robust recruitment checks were carried out to ensure applicants were suitable to work with people in a care setting.

The service was clean and hygienic and infection control practices were followed to minimise the spread of infection. Staff were confident about dealing with emergencies and emergency equipment was in place and easily accessible.

People were cared for and supported by the right amount of suitably skilled and experienced staff. Staff received the training and support to carry out their job and they were provided with opportunities to develop within their roles.

Staff worked well with external health and social care professionals to make sure people received all the care and support they needed. People were referred onto to the appropriate service when concerns about their health or wellbeing were noted. Medication was managed safely and people received their medication on time.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required by law to monitor the operation of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and to report on what we find. Policies and procedures were in place to guide staff in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Decisions made on behalf of people were made in accordance with the law to ensure they were made in people’s best interests.

The service was being well managed by a person described as fair, approachable and supportive. Systems for checking the service people received were in place and improvements were made.

16 April 2014

During a routine inspection

Due to the different ways that the people living at the home communicated we were not able to directly ask them their views of the support they received. However during our visit we met with people living there and we spent time observing the support they received from staff.

We considered our inspection findings to answer questions we always ask;

Is the service safe?

Is the service effective?

Is the service caring?

Is the service responsive?

Is the service well-led?

This is a summary of what we found '

Is the service safe?

Risk assessments had been carried out and risk management plans were in place to ensure people could take part in tasks and activities safely as part of an independent lifestyle. People's health and personal care needs had been met, however there had not always been the right amount of staff working at the home to meet the social care needs of people who used the service. Systems and equipment used at the home had been checked by a suitably qualified person to ensure it was safe to use. People were supported to eat a healthy and balanced diet and staff understood their dietary needs.

Is the service effective?

Staff were respectful and polite towards people who used the service and they encouraged and supported people to take part in the day to day running of the home. Regular checks were carried out at the home to ensure people received safe care and support, including checks on people's finances, care records and the environment.

Is the service caring?

People received the support they needed with their health and personal care needs and they were supported to maintain contact with people who were important to them. Staff had good knowledge of people's choices and support needs and were able to communicate well with them. We observed that staff spent time promoting people's independence and they were kind and treated people with respect.

Is the service responsive?

People had received support to maintain relationships with people important to them. Staff had a good understanding of people's preferences and choices and staff responded appropriately to these. People were supported to attend regular healthcare checks and their healthcare was appropriately monitored. We observed that staff communicated with people using their preferred methods of communication. There was a complaints procedure available at the home which was provided in an easy read format to help people better understand it.

Is the service well-led?

The manager and staff carried out checks at the home to ensure people were safe and protected from any risk of harm.

24 June 2013

During a routine inspection

We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of people who used the service at Birwood. We spoke with staff and communicated with people who used the service. We also spoke with their families by telephone.

People who used the service had limited verbal communication but could communicate in a number of other ways. They were supported by staff who knew the appropriate way to communicate with them when decisions needed to be made about their care and welfare.

Before people received any care they were routinely asked for their consent. Members of staff told us that they always explained all procedures and treatments. The care records we looked at contained evidence of people's views and experiences that were taken into account in the way the service was provided. People's needs were assessed and care and support was planned and delivered in line with their individual care needs. The care plans contained information setting out exactly how each person should be supported to ensure that their needs were met.

People were cared for and supported by suitably qualified, skilled and experienced staff. Appropriate checks had been undertaken before staff began work. This included carrying out a criminal records check and obtaining references from previous employers.

People were protected against the risks associated with medicines because the provider had appropriate arrangements in place to manage medicines.

People were protected from the risks of unsafe or inappropriate care and treatment because accurate and appropriate records were maintained.

4 December 2012

During a routine inspection

We did not receive any direct comments from people living at Birwood because the people who used the service had complex needs which meant they were not able to tell us their experiences.

We observed the support provided by staff and checked a sample of records. During our visit we met individually with people who used the service and we spoke over the telephone to a relative. They said, "This is a very good service, the carers are really good". In addition we spoke with three members of staff who held various roles at Birwood. We observed that the service operated as far as possible as an ordinary domestic household.

We saw evidence that Birwood had acted on recommendations from a previous inspection report regarding work that was needed to ensure that any risks of receiving care or treatment that was inappropriate or unsafe were identified and acted upon in a timely manner. They had provided evidence to demonstrate they had followed up on actions and had introduced a speech therapist and advocates to support the people who used the service.

2 July 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We did not receive any direct comments from people living at Birwood about the outcome areas looked at because the people using the service had complex needs which meant they were not able to tell us their experiences.

We did observe that the care issue had been resolved with the person living at Birwood.

1 March 2012

During a routine inspection

The people who used the service were unable to verbally communicate their views. From our observations they appeared relaxed and happy with the staff supporting them.

We spoke to two relatives who said that the home looked after the people who used the service well and that their needs were taken care of. They said they were kept up to date with health care matters and knew who to talk to if they had any problems.

We asked Knowsley Council and LINks for information about how the service operated. They had no up to date information to provide.

*LINKs are networks of individuals and organisations that have an interest in improving health and social care services. They are independent of the council, NHS and other service providers. LINks aim to involve local people in the planning and delivery of services.