• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: The Crest Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

32 Rutland Drive, Harrogate, HG1 2NS (01423) 563113

Provided and run by:
Bupa Care Homes (GL) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

24th February 2015

During a routine inspection

We undertook this unannounced inspection on the 24 February 2015. We last inspected The Crest on the 9 September 2013. At that inspection we found the home was meeting the regulations that were assessed.

The Crest is owned by BUPA Care Homes. The home is situated in a residential area of Harrogate a short distance from the town centre. The Crest provides residential care for 31 people some of whom live with dementia. The home comprises of 31 rooms, many of which have en-suite facilities. The accommodation is provided over two floors, which are all accessed by a passenger lift or stairs. There are a range of communal, garden and patio areas for people to use.

The home employs a registered manager who had worked at the home for over two years. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service was safe. People spoke positively about the care they received at The Crest and they said they felt safe. We saw there were systems and processes in place to protect people from the risk of harm. Staff were recruited safely and they were trained appropriately to be able to support people. People medicines were managed safely.

People who lacked capacity were protected under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 as the provider was meeting the requirements of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. Applications had been submitted to the local authority, appropriate policies and procedures were in place. Staff had received training to understand and ensure safeguards would be put in place to help to protect people.

People were provided with nutritious food. Assistance and prompting was given by staff where necessary to assist people. Adapted cutlery and crockery were available to people for them to use to help maintain people’s independence.

People’s physical health was monitored. This included the monitoring of people’s health conditions and symptoms, so that appropriate referrals to health professionals were made.

Staff were kind and caring and we observed this throughout our visit. Staff were seen to be attentive and kind to people and they respected people’s individuality, privacy and dignity. Staff we spoke with knew people they were caring for well. People’s care needs were recorded in detail in their individual care records.

The home was well led as the culture at the home was open and transparent with staff working together as one large team. The manager was pro-active and was committed to improving the service. This ensured that the home remained a pleasant place for people to live. The registered manager had an effective quality assurance system in place which ensured that the home remained a safe place for people to live. People living at the home, their relatives and staff working at the home told us that the home was well run and described the manager as ‘dynamic, knowledgeable about dementia care, experienced and listened to people’ were just a few of the comments made to us during our visit.

We received information from Healthwatch. They are an independent body who hold key information about the local views and experiences of people receiving care. CQC has a statutory duty to work with Healthwatch to take account of their views and to consider any concerns that may have been raised with them about this service. We also consulted the Local Authority to see if they had any concerns about the service, and none were raised.

9 September 2013

During a routine inspection

People's needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual care plan. Comments from people included: "The staff are very kind', 'We are genuinely happy' and 'I am a member of a big happy family.' We also spoke with a visiting professional who told us 'We know things will be done right here.'

People were protected from the risks of inadequate nutrition and dehydration. We saw that staff had access to a range of systems that were used to identify and monitor those people at a greater risk of poor nutrition and dehydration.

People who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse, because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening. The Care Quality Commission receives notifications, as required, from The Crest about incidents that have occurred. These notifications show that staff have taken appropriate action to reduce the risk of such an incident re-occurring and confirm they have made the referral to the Local Authority Safeguarding team for them to look into. This process helped to protect people.

Appropriate arrangements were in place in relation to obtaining, recording, administering and returning medicines.

The provider had systems in place to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received. Checks were carried out by the provider, manager and staff on a wide range of areas within the home.

3 January 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We did not talk to people in detail about what it was like to live at The Crest. This visit concentrated on checking whether improvements had been made to the premises, mainly to the carpets in the reception area and main corridors in the home as these areas had an offensive odour.

However during our tour of the premises we also spent some of the time in two the lounges and dining room and saw that some people were sitting relaxed and contented, whilst others were walking around the home as they chose.

17 September 2012

During a routine inspection

We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of people using the service, because the majority of people using the service had complex needs which meant they were not able to tell us their experiences.

We were able to speak with two people living at the home and with one relative of a person who used the service. They told us that people were treated with respect. The relative said "They call my mum by her name and know her likes and dislikes. She is offered choices".

We saw that people were referred to healthcare professionals when necessary and a record was kept of this. One person said "I am very lucky. We are well cared for here". A relative told us "The staff are wonderful. They give my mum little jobs to do to stimulate her".

We spoke with three members of staff. They had a clear understanding of the different types of abuse and who they would report concerns to. The staff understood their role in protecting people.

We saw that there was enough staff to ensure people's needs were met. However staff told us that they were rushed and did not have time to spend with individual people.

People told us there was an odour of urine at the home which was unpleasant. We have asked the provider to address this.

People said they were aware of the complaints process and felt that complaints were responded too.

29 September 2011

During a routine inspection

People who use the service told us they can make their own choices on a daily basis. They also said the staff are very good and if they could do more for them then they would. They said that staff call them by their chosen name. People told us that the food was very good and plentiful and that that staff helped them with their meals and they always had access to drinks.

People who use the service told us they felt safe and well cared for.

Staff spoken with said they received regular support from the manager and are encouraged to do regular training. Staff also said that the manager was approachable and easy to talk to if they needed support.