• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: St Edmunds Residential Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

3-5 Marine Parade, Gorleston, Norfolk, NR31 6DP (01493) 662119

Provided and run by:
St.Edmunds,Limited

All Inspections

03 December 2014

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 03 December 2014 and was unannounced.

St Edmunds Residential Home is a care service that provides accommodation, care and support for up to 39 older people, some of who are living with dementia. At the time of the inspection, there were 37 people living at St Edmunds Residential Home. The provider, St Edmunds Limited, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Eastern Healthcare Limited.

There has not been a registered manager at the service for over six months. However, a manager is in post and they had taken action to apply to be the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The new manager and provider were taking action to make certain that people living at the service were well cared for and the records and systems used in the home were complete and up to date.

Adequate staffing levels were in place to meet people’s needs and staff absence was covered. Staff used a friendly and thoughtful approach when talking with and assisting people and treated them with respect. People were able to raise their concerns, felt safe at the home and received their care from compassionate and competent staff.

Staff had completed training and knew how to make sure that people were safe and protected from abuse. Increased training had been provided and planned for staff to make sure they had suitable opportunities to develop the skills and knowledge they needed to carry out their role. Recruitment checks were being carried out to make certain they were complete and that the staff employed continued to be suitable to care for older people.

People had their needs met and they and their relative were consulted and involved in discussions about the care and support they wished to receive. Reviews of the care plans held for each person were taking place to ensure they contained accurate information and were personalised. Each person was encouraged to maintain their independence and had access to healthcare professionals when they became unwell. Arrangements were being made to increase the range of activities provided for people. Medicines were available for people to take when they needed them, were stored securely and had been accurately recorded when administered.

The new management team had taken action to introduce themselves to people living, visiting and working at the home. People’s concerns were listened to and were dealt with and resolved as quickly as possible. People had been given increased opportunities to raise their concerns and their suggestions for improvements within the service had been listened to by the provider and manager. Plans were in place for regular meetings to be held to discuss the improvements needed and planned within the service.

Staff were involved in discussions when changes in care practice were needed. A new audit system was being introduced to monitor how well the home was being run and to check that people received the care and support they needed. Regular checks had started to be made on the way staff worked, the records held and the maintenance of the premises.

The policies and procedures currently in place were being reviewed and replaced with those used by the new provider. CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards which applies to all care services. Plans were in place for staff to complete this training. People’s capacity to make decisions for themselves about their care was being assessed and the manager knew when to liaise with the supervisory body, about making an application, when a person was at risk of having their liberty restricted or deprived.

2 October 2013

During a routine inspection

During this inspection, we spoke with six people who used the service, six staff, the registered manager and the provider.

We found that people were happy with the care they received and were asked for their consent before the staff performed a task.

People liked the food. One person said, 'The food is quite good.' Another said, 'The sweets are out of this world, we quite often have summer berries. I would not complain about the food, it is always nice and I enjoy it.' A further person said, 'Oh yes, I like the food.' We saw that people had a choice of nutritious food and plenty of drink to ensure that they were well nourished and hydrated.

The service was clean and free from offensive odours. One person told us, 'My room is perfect.' Another person said, 'No one could give a down mark for cleanliness, I never see a speck of dust."

People told us that the staff were caring. One person said, 'I only have to talk to X if I have any problems, I wouldn't like to be anywhere else.' Another person said, 'I am quite happy here, they (the staff) are very caring and do what they can for you."

The staff told us that they were happy working for the service. We saw that they had received training to ensure that the care they provided was safe and effective.

People told us that they did not have any complaints and that they would be confident to talk to the staff if they were unhappy about anything. One person said, 'I have no complaints, I am quite happy with everything.' Another person said, 'I can speak to the proprietor if I have got any problems but I don't have any complaints.'

7 January 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with all told us that they liked living in the service. One person said, 'The staff are kind and attentive. They always come as soon as you call them.' People's preferences for their daily living were noted and respected. People were given the opportunity to take part in activities if they wished, although there was a choice of sitting rooms if they wished to be quieter.

Care plans were comprehensive and up to date. People were involved in the reviews of their plan. There were systems for ensuring any changes in a person's care was communicated to staff. The service made use of external NHS advisers to ensure that people's care was safe and appropriate.

Staffing levels were sufficient for the needs of the people using the service. A visitor told us, 'There are always staff around when I visit.'

People were asked for their views on the service. One person wrote, 'This is second to none. Couldn't be bettered.'

26 October 2011

During a routine inspection

People with whom we spoke told us that they had chosen to live in St Edmunds and all but one said they were very happy there. One person told us that they didn't really want to live in St Edmunds and that they were very sad about having to move out of their own home, but they said they realised that they were no longer able to live on their own or look after themselves. This person also told us that the staff were very good but sometimes they had to, "Wait for assistance if they are dealing with someone else".

People told us that had been able to visit the home before deciding to move in.

People also told us, "we can more or less do as we please here" and one person said that they enjoyed going out for a walk with staff each day.

Another person we spoke with said: "I do like going out and I look forward to that. I've been here about four years now and the time goes so quickly. Sometimes it's quiet but at others it's like Picadilly Circus. Yes, I'm very happy here, thank you."

One person we spoke with told us how good the staff were and how they helped them to stay as independent as possible, despite having hearing trouble and suffering from seizures. This person told us that they trusted all the staff and felt happy and safe living in St Edmunds.

Another person told us how the home used to be a hotel and how it felt like they were "living in a high class hotel". They told us that the food was "superb" and, altogether, they were cared for very well.

"Wouldn't change a thing" and, "it's like being on a permanent holiday" were other comments we received.