• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: The Shrubbery Nursing Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

23-31 Shrubbery Avenue, Worcester, Worcestershire, WR1 1QN (01905) 28916

Provided and run by:
Dove Care Homes Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

11 & 12 June 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 11 & 12 June 2015 and was unannounced.

The home provides accommodation for a maximum of 36 people requiring nursing or personal care. There were 25 people living at the home when we visited. A manager was in post who had applied to become the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were positive about the care they received and about the staff who looked after them.

People told us that they felt that felt safe and staff understood how to keep them safe.

People received care from staff who understood how to manage risks when caring for them. People received their medicines at the correct time and medications were safely administered and stored. People who required additional medication were also supported to receive these.

People received care and support from staff who were regularly supervised and who had received training to care for them. Staff understood their roles and any individual care needs people had.

People’s consent was appropriately obtained by staff when caring for them and people who could not make decisions for themselves were supported by staff within the requirements of the law.

People enjoyed their food and were supported to eat and drink enough to keep them healthy and had choices at mealtimes. Where people had special dietary requirements, these were provided.

People had their health needs assessed and care staff understood how they should care for people. Where care staff became concerned or unsure, they would approach nursing staff or contact another health professional such as GP.

People liked the staff that cared for them and care staff involved people when caring for them.

People’s privacy and dignity were respected and people were treated in a manner they would expect to be treated in and were supported to make choices affecting their care.

People’s concerns were not always shared with the manager when staff became aware of them. The operations manager has taken steps to ensure training is delivered so that staff are clear about what information the manager ought to be aware of.

People chose whether or not to participate in a wide variety of activities and people’s individual interests and religious beliefs were supported.

People told us that they had an easy relationship with manager and that the manager was approachable. Staff caring for people reported an improved morale within the team and that they received clearer direction from management.

People’s care was regularly checked and reviewed by the manager. The quality of the care people received was also routinely reviewed to ensure that the quality of the care could be monitored and improvements made where required.

25 July 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five people who lived at the home and two relatives of people who used the service. We spoke with the area manager, a manager and two staff. We spent time observing the interactions between staff and people who used the service.

People were given choice with day to day decisions and were encouraged to remain as independent as possible. People that we spoke with confirmed staff respected their privacy when personal care was provided.

We found consent had been obtained from people before care and treatment had been provided. Alternative arrangements had been made to support people who were unable to consent to their treatment or support.

The care and support that people received had not always met people's expectations. We found on occasions some people had experienced delays when they required help and support with personal care.

The staffing levels for the home were not sufficient to meet the needs of the people who were living at the home. We found that people did not always receive the care and support when they needed it.

We looked at records which showed that the provider was regularly monitoring the quality of its service.

In this report the name of a registered manager appears who was not in post and not managing the regulatory activities at this location at the time of the inspection. Their name appears because they were still a Registered Manager on our register at the time.

23 November 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people who used the service. One person told us that they had gained some of the weight that they had lost in hospital since being at the service. One person told us that they were given a choice of meals and that the food was good. Another person told us that they were "happy with the food".

We found that care staff knew people's current care and nutritional needs and that these needs had been documented and planned for and met. We found that the service liaised with local health professionals to make sure that people's needs were being met effectively.

People who used the service were safeguarded from abuse as the provider had taken steps to make sure that abuse could be identified and acted on appropriately. The provider had transparently reviewed another service where mistakes were made to make sure that they learned lessons to protect people who used their services. One person who used the service told us that staff were "very nice", and another person told us staff were "very, very good".

The registered manager recorded and responded to the feedback they received about the service. People who used the service were given information on how to raise concerns or make a complaint, and were also provided with the contact details of a local advocacy service.

2 May 2012

During an inspection in response to concerns

We carried out this review because concerns were identified at another of the provider's locations and not The Shrubbery Nursing Home.

We spoke with people who used the service and their relatives. One person told us 'my room is very nice' and it had been newly decorated. One person's relative told us that they were 'very happy' and that staff were friendly and approachable.

One person told us that staff would bring any food they requested and that there was 'always soup and sandwiches available and two hot meals a day'. We were told by a person who used the service that if you asked for something to eat the staff would bring it. They told us that another person in the home had asked for a pancake the other day and that staff had made one for them which they really enjoyed.

One person who spent most of their time in the communal areas within the home told us that they didn't have to wait long to be assisted when they had rung the call bell.