• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Danesford Grange Care Home

Kidderminster Road, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV15 6QD (01746) 763118

Provided and run by:
Mr & Mrs MP Blandy & Mr CGA Rands

All Inspections

25 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with six people who were using the service and with four family members. We spoke with three members of staff and the manager. We observed daily routines and interactions between staff and people using the service. Some people were unable to express their views about the service due to nature of their illness.

People were complimentary about staff and the service they received. Comments included "I have made the right decision coming to live here" and "I am involved in decisions about my care, something I didn't have in other homes". A relative said "It is an old building they are improving, but the care is good and I have no concerns".

People were supported to make every day decisions. Where they were unable to make more complex decisions for themselves the provider acted in accordance with the legal requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Care records contained detailed information about people's individual needs. Risk assessments for each person were in place. Care records and risk assessments had been reviewed monthly. Relatives had been invited to reviews. We were told that none had attended.

Effective arrangements were in place to ensure that people received their medicines safely and as prescribed.

New training arrangements were in place. Staff said that they had benefited from the changes.

A complaints procedure was in place and known to people using the service and relatives. No complaints had been received by the home since 2010.

16 October 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with seven of the 32 people who were living at the home, three visiting relatives, a health professional and five staff. People told us they liked living at the home. One person said, 'It's nice here, I can recommend it'. We saw staff respected people's privacy and dignity and promoted their independence.

People's needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual care plan. Staff had a good understanding of the needs of the people whose care we looked at in detail. One relative told us, 'I am very happy with the care, they are well looked after'.

People told us they liked the food. Comments included, 'The food is good' and, 'The lunch was lovely'. We saw that people chose their meals in advance. Where people required assistance with eating, we saw staff provide support discreetly and respectfully.

Staff were confident to recognise and report abuse. They demonstrated an understanding of the different forms of abuse and knew the procedure to follow if they suspected abuse or observed any poor practice.

People considered there were generally enough staff on duty to meet their needs. Changes had been made to provide more staff on duty at key times of the day.

There were processes in place to monitor the quality of the service and ensure the safety and welfare of people who lived and worked at the home.

1 June 2011

During a routine inspection

We spoke with six people who use the service, four relatives and nine staff. People who were able to share their experiences of living at Danesford Grange were overall positive about the care that they receive and considered that their privacy and dignity is upheld. They told us that 'staff are very nice' and that 'the food is lovely'. People said that they were happy with their rooms and that these were comfortable.

People considered that they are involved in their care and decisions affecting them. Most people told us that they enjoy their meals although observations evidenced that there are not enough staff to support people who require assistance with eating. Many people expressed concern about staffing levels and this was also reflected in discussions we had with two visitors and four staff. We were told that on occasions people can be left unsupervised in the lounges for long periods of time because staff are busy seeing to the needs of other people living at the home.

People were very positive about the manager/matron. They told us, 'The matron always tells us what's going on'. 'She is lovely'. 'I like the matron; she is the best you can get'. 'She definitely believes in good quality care'.

Two visitors told us that their relative 'always looks immaculate' every time they visit and that when they visit they are always made welcome. They told us that they had been fully involved in the assessment and admission process of their relative and stated, 'It's the best hotel he could be in'. They reported that the home is kept beautifully clean and their relative's room is always kept neat and tidy. Other people we spoke with said they were happy with the care their relative receives.

Staff told us that they enjoy working at the home and that they are provided with many training opportunities to develop their skills and knowledge. They told us that the care plans are reflective of people's individual needs and provided good examples of how they promote privacy and dignity. Staff were positive about their work. Comments include: 'The level of care here is very good and we try to involve the resident's as much as possible in their care'. 'I always treat people as I would like to be treated, the care is good'. 'I love working here; I feel part of a family'. 'It's a good place to work'.

Shropshire Local Involvement Network (LINk) visited the home on 25 March 2011. LINk is made up of individuals, community groups and voluntary organisations with an interest in improving health and social care services. They told us that the level of care is high and staff had a high level of commitment and were cheerful and respectful when dealing with the people using the service. They said discussions held with people living at the home evidence they were satisfied with the accommodation and care they were receiving. They commented, 'While assurances were given that every effort is made to maintain a clean environment it was noted that many of the carpets were worn or discoloured and that, in some areas, plasterwork and ceiling tiles were in need of attention. This was acknowledged and an assurance was given that the necessary improvements would be carried out as soon as funds became available'.