• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: A1 Medical & General Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

3 Nidd House, Richmond Business Park, Sidings Court, Doncaster, DN4 5NL (01302) 323957

Provided and run by:
A1 Medical & General Ltd

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 27 June 2023

The inspection

We carried out this performance review and assessment under Section 46 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act). We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements of the regulations associated with the Act and looked at the quality of the service to provide a rating.

Unlike our standard approach to assessing performance, we did not physically visit the office of the location. This is a new approach we have introduced to reviewing and assessing performance of some care at home providers. Instead of visiting the office location we use technology such as electronic file sharing and video or phone calls to engage with people using the service and staff.

Inspection team

This inspection was carried out by 1 inspector.

Service and service type

This service provides care and support to people living in 'supported living' settings, so that they can live as independently as possible. People's care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people's personal care and support.

Registered Manager

This provider is required to have a registered manager to oversee the delivery of regulated activities at this location. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers and providers are legally responsible for how the service is run, for the quality and safety of the care provided and compliance with regulations.

At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post. The nominated individual had been workings as the manager and had been in post for several months and had submitted an application to register. We are currently assessing this application. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider.

Notice of inspection

We gave a short period notice of the inspection in line with our new methodology.

Inspection activity started on 1 June 2023 and ended on 6 June 2023.

What we did before the inspection

We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return (PIR). This is information providers are required to send us annually with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. We used all this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

This performance review and assessment was carried out without a visit to the location’s office. We used technology such as telephone calls to enable us to engage with people using the service, and electronic file sharing to enable us to review documentation. The inspection took place on 1 June and 6 June 2023.

We reviewed a range of records related to 1 person’s care and support. This included care plans and risk assessments. We reviewed staff files which included recruitment and training. We reviewed records in relation to the management of the service which included quality assurance, and a range of policies and procedures. We spoke to the manager and gathered feedback from 4 care workers.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 27 June 2023

About the service

A1 Medical & General Ltd is a domiciliary care agency providing support for people in their own homes. Not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection there were 2 people using the service.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Right Support:

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. We made a recommendation to the provider about recording mental capacity decisions. People were supported by staff to pursue their interests. Staff supported people to make decisions following best practice in decision making. Staff communicated with people in ways that met their needs. Staff supported people to play an active role in maintaining their own health and wellbeing.

Right Care:

Staff promoted equality and diversity in their support for people. They understood people's cultural needs and provided appropriate care to meet people’s needs. People received kind and compassionate care. Staff protected and respected people's privacy and dignity. They understood and responded to their individual needs. People could take part in activities and pursue interests that were tailored to them. The service gave people opportunities to try new activities that enhanced and enriched their lives. We made a recommendation to the provider on strengthening the system they use to check the delivery of the service.

Right Culture:

People were kept safe from avoidable harm because staff knew them well and understood how to protect them from abuse. The service worked well with other agencies to do so. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse and they knew how to apply it. Staff could recognise signs when people experienced emotional distress and knew how to support them to minimise the need to restrict their freedom to keep them safe.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for the service at the previous premises was good, published on 31 August 2019.

Why we inspected

This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

This was an ‘inspection using remote technology’. This means we did not visit the office location and instead used technology such as electronic file sharing to gather information, and video and phone calls to engage with people using the service as part of this performance review and assessment.