• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Hazel Court Nursing Home

Hayden Way, Off St Johns Hill, Battersea, London, SW11 1YF (020) 8870 6933

Provided and run by:
The Shaw Foundation Limited

All Inspections

12 June 2014

During a routine inspection

There were fifteen people living at Hazel Court at the time of our inspection. On the day that we visited we were not able to gain the views of people using the service because of their level of dementia. However we observed care, carried out a SOFI and spoke with relatives of two people living at the home. We looked at four care plans, and other documents such as training records, meeting minutes and audits.

A single inspector carried out this inspection. The focus of the inspection was to answer five key questions; is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Below is a summary of what we found.

If you want to see the evidence that supports our summary please read the full report.

Is the service safe?

The provider had an effective system in place to report and investigate safeguarding concerns. People were being cared for in an environment that was safe.

Is the service effective?

Relatives were involved in care plan reviews where people did not have the capacity to understand decisions related to their care and treatment. Care plans were current and reflected people's individual needs and choices. We found that staff did not have up to date training which meant they may not be able to support people effectively.

Is the service caring?

We observed staff treating people with respect and offering them choices. They engaged with people and were familiar with the needs of people they were caring for.

Is the service responsive?

Where people did not have the capacity to understand decisions relating to their care we saw that best interest meetings were held to protect their rights. Advocacy support was provided to people that needed it.

Is the service well-led?

A new manager had recently been appointed at the home. Staff and relatives that we spoke with felt supported and involved in the running of the home.

19 December 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spent time with were relaxed and were happy to participate in general conversation. We saw that if someone became distressed a member of care staff arrived promptly to support them. We observed care staff taking sufficient time to support people, which they did by asking people about what was troubling them and providing information and guidance before they carried out any task for people, Care staff used polite and respectful language when addressing people and assistance was provided in a calm and discreet manner.

We looked at staff files and saw that care staff had participated in training staff in dementia care awareness and the Gold Standard Framework for End of Life Care, a standard of care for people approaching the end of their lives. Staff were able to describe the difference kinds of support that each person needed and confirmed that they had received training in dementia awareness, moving and handling and pressure care.

We gathered evidence of people's experience of the service by speaking with relatives and reviewing records. A relative of one person living at the home told us that their relative was well cared for and safe living at the home. They told us that they trusted staff to provide good care and they could speak to staff if they had concerns. One relative told us: "if my husband has any kind of incident, no matter how small, if he stubbed his toe, the staff would contact me and explain what happened".

Nursing staff were able to describe and demonstrate the procedures for the receipt and monitoring of medications. We were also shown the procedure for storage and recording of medicines administered. Blister packs and medicine recording sheets were seen and found to be accurate and up to date.

The provider may wish to note that commitment of the current staff team and the acting manager are managing to ensure the continued safety and care of people at Hazel Court. However, without active involvement and support from senior management and a clear action plan to address the current situation may not be sustainable.

20 August 2012

During a routine inspection

We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of people using the service, because some of the people using the service had complex needs which meant that not all people we spoke with were able to tell us their experiences. We spoke with two relatives of people living at Hazel Court who told us that they could talk to staff who would act upon the comments and suggestions they made. One relative said 'The staff will do anything to help my wife; I can ask to see the head nurse or manager if I'm worried about anything.' We also spoke with six staff working day shifts and two staff working night shifts.

We gathered evidence of people's experiences of the service by looking at reports and documents and reviewing comments made by others in the complaints and compliments log. We found that the home was listening to family and relatives to understand the support needs of people living at Hazel Court.

3 October 2011

During a routine inspection

People told us they liked living at the service.

Relatives told us they feel that people are well supported by the staff.

The atmosphere within the home was relaxed and friendly.

However, we identified risks to people in the support that they receive.