• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Weedington Road Supported Living Service

321 Weedington Road, London, NW5 4PR

Provided and run by:
Circle Care And Support

All Inspections

4 November 2013

During a routine inspection

Weedington Road Supported Living Service provided care and support to up to six people who had complex needs. People who used the service had limited verbal communication abilities and we were only able to speak with one person about their experiences at the service. The person's comments included that they liked the staff and were happy with the service. We also asked the person if they were satisfied with the meals that were provided and the response was that 'I buy my own food'. This also meant that the person was enabled to make their own choices.

We observed that staff were familiar with people's needs including their communication needs and treated people with respect and according to their abilities. We found that people's support was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure their welfare and safety. We found that the provider took steps to ensure that people's privacy, dignity and independence were respected. Records about people and their needs were accurate and available for staff.

We found that people were cared for in an environment that was suitably designed and adequately maintained.

19 March 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with one person who used the service and observed how staff supported people with their care. The person we spoke with told us that they were happy with their care and that staff made them 'laugh'. They said they were involved in their care and could 'choose" what they wanted to eat or how they wanted to spend their time. We noted that people's care plans were reviewed and people had appropriate care and support that met their needs. People's religious needs were met. If people wanted they were being supported to attend places of worship.

The service had enough trained and experienced staff at all times to meet people's needs. Best interest meetings had been organised for people who lacked capacity to ensure that appropriate decisions were made to meet their needs. The provider had systems in place for administering and monitoring medication. We noted staff had training in medication administration. However, there was a gap in medication administration which could potentially put people at risk. The provider may find it useful to note that there were two errors in the medication administration for one person who used the service.

The service had a complaints procedure and people were encouraged by staff to make a complaint if they were not happy.

28 March 2012

During a routine inspection

We used several different methods to help us understand the experiences of people using the service. This was because most of the people using the service had complex needs which meant they were unable to tell us about their experiences. We observed afternoon and evening routines and the interactions between staff and people using the service.

We spoke to two relatives and two lead professionals who told us that the service was person centred and focused on meeting people's needs. People we spoke to were positive about the service and told us that the service provided very good care.