• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Lumb Valley Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Burnley Road East, Lumb, Rossendale, Lancashire, BB4 9PQ (01706) 225027

Provided and run by:
Mr Waqar Hussain

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

27 January 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Lumb Valley Care Home is a residential care home providing personal care to 21 people at the time of the inspection. The service can support up to 22 people. The home is located in the area of Lumb in Rossendale.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The registered manager had implemented infection prevention and control procedures which were understood and followed by the staff. All staff had completed training on the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and participated in the weekly testing programme. We observed all staff were wearing appropriate PPE. Not all bedroom ensuites were equipped with soap, paper hand towels and a pedal bin. The provider ordered these items during the inspection.

There were sufficient numbers of staff deployed to meet people's needs and ensure their safety. Appropriate recruitment procedures ensured prospective staff were suitable to work in the home.

Risk assessments were carried out to enable people to retain their independence and receive care with minimum risk to themselves or others. There had been significant improvements to the premises since the last inspection. The provider was in the process of addressing some ongoing issues with the heating system on the ground floor. A plumber attended the home during our visit to check the boiler and the radiators. There were established arrangements for the ongoing maintenance of the home. Apart from the electrical safety certificate, all other safety certificates were up to date. The provider agreed to confirm when the electrical safety check had been completed.

The registered manager understood how to safeguard people from abuse and report any concerns. During our visit, the home was calm, and staff were well organised. We observed staff responded promptly to people’s needs.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 4 July 2018).

Why we inspected

We undertook this targeted inspection to check whether the provider had met the requirements of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities). The overall rating for the service has not changed following this targeted inspection and remains good.

CQC have introduced targeted inspections to follow up on Warning Notices or to check specific concerns. They do not look at an entire key question, only the part of the key question we are specifically concerned about. Targeted inspections do not change the rating from the previous inspection. This is because they do not assess all areas of a key question.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to coronavirus and other infection outbreaks effectively.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

4 June 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an unannounced inspection of Lumb Valley Care Home on 4 and 5 June 2018.

At the last inspection in January 2016, we rated the service as good. At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the rating of good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

At this inspection, we found the service remained Good.

At the time of our inspection, the manager was not yet registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). However, following the inspection we were notified that the application to register the manager with CQC had been approved. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Lumb Valley care home is registered to provide accommodation, personal care and support for 22 people. Lumb Valley care home is located in the area of Lumb in Rossendale. The accommodation consists of communal areas and single and twin-bedded rooms on three floors with stair lift access; there is a separate unit for people living with dementia. There are accessible gardens and safe patio areas and a small car park for visitors and staff. At time of the inspection there were 16 people accommodated in the home.

People were happy with the care they received and made positive comments about the staff. They told us they felt safe and happy in the home and were comfortable in the company of staff. Staff understood how to protect people from abuse.

The information in people's care plans was sufficiently detailed to ensure they were at the centre of their care. People's care and support was kept under review and they were involved in decisions about their care. Risks to people's health and safety had been identified, assessed and managed safely. Relevant health and social care professionals provided advice and support when people's needs changed.

The home was a clean and comfortable place for people to live in. Appropriate aids and adaptations had been provided to help maintain people's safety, independence and comfort. Further improvements to the home were planned.

A safe recruitment procedure was followed and arrangements were in place to make sure staff were trained and competent. People considered there were enough staff to support them. People received their medicines when they needed them. Staff administering medicines had received training and supervision to do this safely.

People had choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Staff respected people's diversity and promoted people's right to be free from discrimination. People's dignity and privacy was respected and upheld and staff encouraged people to be as independent as possible.

People had access to suitable activities. People were given a choice of meals and staff knew their likes and dislikes. People's nutritional needs were monitored and reviewed. People told us they were happy and knew how to raise their concerns and complaints; they were confident they would be listened to.

There were effective systems for assessing, monitoring and developing the quality of the service. People and their relatives were consulted around their care and support and their views were acted upon.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

20 January 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an unannounced inspection of Lumb Valley care home on the 21 and 22 January 2016.

Lumb Valley care home is registered to provide accommodation, personal care and support for 22 people. Lumb Valley care home is located in the area of Lumb in Rossendale. The accommodation consists of single and twin-bedded rooms. Communal lounges and dining room are located on the ground floor. There is also a small car park for visitors and staff. At the time of the inspection there were 19 people accommodated at the home.

The service was last inspected in October 2013 and was found compliant in all areas inspected. At the time of this inspection there was a registered manager employed. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service had recently been awarded fifth place in the top 20 recommended care homes in North West England by the Care Home Awards 2015. The Top 20 Care Home Awards 2015 highlight the most recommended care homes in each region of the UK. The Awards are based on over 45,000 reviews received from residents, family and friends of residents during 2014.

Throughout this inspection we received positive feedback from people who used the service, visitors and community professionals. People expressed satisfaction with the service provided and spoke very highly of the staff that supported them. Comments included, “They are very caring here, staff get very passionate about the people they care for” and “I have nothing to complain about. I really like living here”.

We noted the service had robust processes and procedures in place to maintain a safe environment for people accessing the service and for staff and visitors. The service had detailed and up to date health and safety checks which covered areas such as electrical safety, use of stairs, use of bathrooms, workplace safety, gas supply and appliances.

We noted audits on equipment and furnishings were done on a monthly basis. These audits included bedrooms, lounge, stairs, garden area, stair lift and hoists. We saw the service had a robust fire procedure and each person living at the service had a personal evacuation plan. We noted the service was compliant in a recent fire safety audit carried out by the local fire service. However, we noted that bedroom doors were not numbered. Therefore, this could have an impact on the identification of people by the emergency services should they be called to the service at any time.

People using the service told us they felt safe living at the home. Visitors were also confident that their relatives were in a safe place. We noted robust safeguarding procedures were in place and staff showed a good understanding around recognising the signs of abuse. Staff had also undertaken safeguarding training.

At the time of inspection we found the service had adequate staffing levels. Staff told us they had adequate time to undertake the caring role effectively. People told us their needs were met appropriately and staff had time to sit with them. We observed a good level of staff interaction to support this.

We found the service had a good recruitment system in place. However we noted the service needed to make provisions for dates of employment to be documented throughout the application form. We found the service required all new staff to undertake a thorough twelve week induction process.

The service had processes in place for the appropriate administration of medication. Staff were adequately trained in medication administration. Medication was stored safely and in line with current guidance.

We saw the service had created detailed individual risk assessments for all people using the service. These risk assessments included diet and nutrition, pressure relief and mobility.

We saw detailed care plans, which gave clear information about the people's needs, wishes, feelings and health conditions. These were reviewed monthly and more often when needed by the registered manager.

We saw evidence of detailed training programmes for staff. All carers had a Level 2 or above NVQ (National Vocational Qualification) or were working towards a NVQ level 3 Diploma in care. All people spoken with were very positive about staff knowledge and skills and felt their needs were being met appropriately.

Staff spoken with were aware of the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). These provided legal safeguards for people who may be unable to make their own decisions. The manager also demonstrated their knowledge about the process to follow should it be necessary to place any restrictions on a person who used the service in their best interests. At the time of inspection we found that no person using the service was subject to a DoLS.

We noted that people's nutritional requirements were being met and choice was offered at every meal time. We saw the food was freshly prepared and served at a suitable temperature.

We saw appropriate referrals had been made to dieticians and instructions were strictly followed in cases where people had known dietary requirements. One health care professional referred to the registered manager as, “Innovative” with health care referrals.

Over the two days of the inspection we noted positive staff interaction and engagement with people using the service. Staff addressed people in a respectful and caring manner. The service had a calm and warm atmosphere. We observed people enjoying each other’s company, singing, laughing and conversing.

We had positive feedback from people using the service, relatives and staff about the registered manager. People told us they were happy to approach management with any concerns or questions.

1 October 2013

During a routine inspection

People using the service told us that they liked living at Lumb Valley and were satisfied with the care and attention they received. One person said, 'I'm really comfortable, the staff are very good and I'm well looked after.'

We found that suitable arrangements were in place for the safe keeping and handling of medicines.

We saw that the home was warm, well ventilated and generally well maintained. . One person said, 'I've got a nice bedroom and it's clean.'

We noted that recruitment procedures were thorough in order to protect people from the employment of unsuitable staff.

Complaints were taken seriously and investigated. People told us they felt confident to make a complaint should the need arise.

9 October 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

At the last inspection of 9 July 2012 we found that staffing levels at night were insufficient to meet the needs of people using the service and new members of staff were not receiving induction training. These were serious concerns and warning notices were issued. This inspection was carried out to check that action had been taken to achieve compliance with these issues.

We found that staffing levels had been increased throughout the night and during the day in order to ensure the needs of people using the service were met.

We saw that a thorough induction programme was in place for new employees. The care workers on duty told us they felt supported by the manager and the increased staffing levels meant she had time for regular one to one supervision meetings with them.

9 July 2012

During an inspection in response to concerns

This inspection was carried out in response to information of concern we received about staffing levels and staff training.

We found that on several occasions at night people were at risk of receiving inappropriate and unsafe care because of inadequate staffing levels.

We noted that recently employed and inexperienced care workers had not been given any training for their role. This also put people at risk of receiving inappropriate and unsafe care.

30 April 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Since the last inspection of December 2011 improvements have been made and the provider has complied with the warning notices issued in respect of staff training and monitoring the quality of the service.

All the people we asked told us they were satisfied with the care provided. One person said, 'They really look after you, the care is excellent.' Another person said, 'The staff are very good and I choose what to do, I get up at 6.30am.'

People using the service and their relatives were involved in planning their care in order to ensure people were cared for in the way they preferred.

We observed members of staff attending to people in a professional and courteous manner.

People using the service were consulted about the care and facilities provided at the home and were given the opportunity to express their views at monthly meetings. One person said, 'We can air our views at the meetings.'

All members of staff have received the training they needed in order to provide safe and effective care for people using the service.

6 December 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We asked several people for their views about the home. One person said they were happy living at Lumb valley. Another person told us members of staff were polite. One person told us that the staff needed to listen to the views of people living in the service more clearly.

We found that privacy and dignity for people in shared rooms was compromised. Independence was not always promoted for people because of the location of their bedrooms and an unsuitable lock on the bathroom door.

We have visited Lumb Valley on two occasions this year and have found only minimal improvements have been made to the premises since the last inspection. Most of the bedroom carpets were badly stained and the bath hoist seat was cracked and badly stained.

Our observations and findings indicated people were not always receiving appropriate support or person centred care. People's weight could not be properly monitored because the scales were old and unsuitable for some people. Care records were not kept up to date which meant people were at risk of inconsistent and inappropriate care.

Training for members of staff was inadequate and meant that a care worker qualified to administer first aid was not always on duty. None of the staff had received training in infection control training and one of the cooks did not have a food hygiene certificate. Staff told us that they planned the menus, that food was home cooked and offered a choice of options. People living at Lumb Valley told us the food was generally good.

18 August 2011

During a routine inspection

People told us that they liked living at the home. One person said,"The staff are very good, I don't have to wait when I need attention." Another person said, "The staff help me and I can choose when to get up and go to bed."

We asked several people what they did all day and were told there was nothing to do. One person said, "We used to play bingo but we don't do it now."

All the people we asked told us they had enjoyed their lunch and the meals were good.

One visitor said the staff were considerate and she was impressed with the care.

26 November and 10 December 2010

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We spoke with three people who lived in the home about their medicines. One person that was looking after their own medicines said care workers supported them to do this safely and they gave the right amount of support. This person said care workers were really kind, helpful and fun and they always made sure they always got fresh supplies of medicines on time. They also said the care workers would do anything he asked of them including cooking food that they had bought for themselves.

The same person said staff always gave them their medicines on time including one of their tablets that needed to be given earlier so that it would work properly.

Another person that had severe pain problems said their medicines were always given to them properly and care workers always made sure the GP and nurses visited regularly to make sure they were getting the best treatment.

We spoke with a person that needed a special diet to help manage their diabetes and they said care workers helped them do this. They also said that staff helped them manage their medicines and blood tests and that this was done properly.

People living at the home told us that Lumb Valley was a comfortable place to live. One person said, "I like my bedroom it's grand and I have some of my own things." Another person said, "I like my bedroom it's smashing."

People told us the staff were very nice and they were looked after.