• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: United Response - 15 Osborne Road

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

15 Osborne Road, Lytham St Annes, Lancashire, FY8 1HS (01253) 711955

Provided and run by:
United Response

All Inspections

16 March 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection visit took place on 16 March 2017 and was unannounced.

United Response - 15 Osborne Rd is a small care home registered to provide care and accommodation for up to three people. The home is a detached house located close to St Anne’s town centre and a variety of local services and amenities. Each person has their own bedroom and shares communal facilities. At the time of our inspection three people lived at 15 Osborne Rd. They had lived together for several years.

At the last comprehensive inspection on 20th November 2014 the service was rated overall as good. At this inspection we found the service remained good.

There were procedures in place to protect people from abuse and unsafe care. We saw risk assessments were in place which provided guidance for staff. This minimised risks to people.

Although people had limited verbal communication we were able to speak with two people who lived at the home or their relatives. They told us they felt safe with staff, and liked the staff who supported them. One person said, "Yes I am safe here." They said staff were friendly and respectful.

Staff supported people with medicines safely. Medicines were stored securely, administered as prescribed and disposed of appropriately.

There were sufficient staff available to provide personal care and individual social and leisure activities. They received training to carry out their role and were knowledgeable how to support and care for people. They had the skills, knowledge and experience to provide safe and effective support.

Staff understood the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

People told us they were happy with the variety and choice of meals available to them.

Care plans were personalised detailing how people wished to be supported. People who received support or where appropriate their relatives were involved in making decisions about their care. Their consent and agreement were sought before providing care.

People who used the service or their relatives knew how to raise a concern or to make a complaint. The complaints procedure was available and people said they were encouraged to raise any concerns.

Senior staff monitored the support staff provided to people. They checked staff arrived on time and supported people in the way people wanted. Audits of care and support records and risk assessments were carried out regularly. People and their relatives were encouraged to complete surveys about the quality of their care.

20th November 2014

During a routine inspection

United Response - 15 Osborne Rd is a small care home registered to provide care and accommodation for up to three people. The home is a detached house located close to St Annes town centre and a variety of local services and amenities. Each person has their own bedroom and shares communal facilities. The registered provider is the national charitable organisation, United Response.

The service was last inspected on 13th December 2013 and was found to be fully compliant in all the areas assessed.

This inspection took place on the 20th November 2014 and was unannounced. The inspection was carried out by a lead adult social care inspector.

There was a registered manager in place at the home who was on duty at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

During the inspection we spoke with all the people who used the service, their relatives and advocates, community professionals and staff. The feedback we received from people was very positive and people expressed satisfaction with all aspects of the service provided.

People expressed confidence in the service to meet their, or their loved one’s needs and spoke highly of staff and the registered manager.

We found people were provided with safe and effective care and that risks to their safety and welfare were well managed.

People were supported to access health care when they required it. There were processes in place for the safe storage and administration of people’s medicines. However, we made a recommendation that the provider reviews relevant guidance on the safe storage of medicines.

Staff had a good understanding of people’s needs and the support they required. People were enabled to express their personal wishes about their support and how they wanted it to be provided.

Staff were carefully recruited and provided with a good level of training and support. Staffing levels at the service were calculated in line with the needs of people who used the service and constantly reviewed.

People were encouraged to express their views about their care and the service as a whole. People told us they would feel able to raise concerns if they needed to and they were confident any concerns they did raise would be dealt with properly.

There was a well established management structure in place and clear lines of accountability. The registered manager and provider had effective systems to regularly assess and monitor the quality of the service that people received.

11 December 2013

During a routine inspection

There were three people living in the home when we visited. Some people had communication difficulties and were unable to have a detailed conversation about the care and support they received. However where possible we talked with people in a general way and we observed how people were supported by staff.

We met all three people. As people living in the home had limited verbal communication, we also talked to relatives to find out their views of the home.

We observed staff communicating with people. We saw that they were friendly and respectful and that they communicated effectively.

Person centred care records were in place providing information about people. These were updated frequently and showed that people were involved in decisions.

Osborne Road was maintained and decorated for the comfort of the people living there. Bedrooms were personalised according to people's wishes.

The home was staffed well enough to provide people with individual and group activities.

There were regular checks of the quality of the service and changes made if needed.

22 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We observed how people were supported by staff and talked with people where possible. We saw staff supporting people in a polite and friendly manner. We observed staff support during the inspection. Staff interacted frequently with people and were responsive to their needs. People told us they were happy at Osborne Rd. One person said, 'I love it here, it is better than anywhere.'

We spoke with relatives of some of the people who lived at 15 Osborne Rd. They said that their family member was treated with respect and that they were involved in decisions about care. One relative said, 'The staff involve us all the time and phone us regularly.'

People told us that they were happy with the staff. One person said 'They are great.' People said they felt safe at Osborne Rd. They said staff would help them if they were upset. Relatives were praising about the staff. They felt the staff were good and cared well for their family member.

Each person had an individually structured routine, based on their likes and dislikes. People were encouraged to make decisions about the educational and leisure activities they wanted to do. They were also encouraged to develop daily living skills.

Person centred care records were in place, which provided up to date information about the support needs and lifestyles of people.

There were regular checks by managers of the service to make sure the home was running well and meeting people's needs.

12 May 2011

During a routine inspection

One person indicated they were happy with the care and support they were receiving and that the staff were good.

A relative of one person said that the staff keep in touch with them and assist their family member to keep in touch.

Staff chatted to one person who indicated what he would like to do later in the evening.

We observed staff taking account of non verbal reactions of one person living in the home so that they could anticipate and meet his needs. They offered a choice of activities he liked persisting until they found the one he wanted.

Staff chatted to another person in the home, involving and including him in conversation and asking what he had been doing earlier in the day. When asked if he enjoyed living in the home he nodded yes.

Relatives spoke to said that there is a very settled and stable staff team who provide very good care. A relative said, 'I couldn't be happier with the care provided or the staff.'

We asked one person if they had enjoyed their meal and they nodded yes.

A health and social care profession said they were well satisfied with the care and support provided in Osborne Road.

When asked if he liked the staff, the person nodded and smiled.

One relative said, 'The staff commitment is second to none.' Another relative said, 'I am very happy with the staff.'

The staff we spoke to felt well supported by their immediate managers and by the organisation as a whole.

A relative said they could talk to staff if they had any concerns and they would help.