• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Park House Nursing Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

27 Park Crescent, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, PE1 4DX (01733) 555700

Provided and run by:
T. L. C. Homes Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

26 August 2015

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection of this service on 9 December 2014. A breach of two legal requirements was found. This was because people were not protected against identifiable risks of acquiring an infection and people had not always received their medicines as required.

After the comprehensive inspection the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet legal requirements in relation to the breaches.

We undertook this unannounced focused inspection on 26 August 2015 to check that the provider had followed their plan and to confirm that they now met legal requirements.

This report only covers our findings in relation to this topic. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Park House Nursing Home on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Park House Nursing Home is registered to provide accommodation, nursing care and personal care for up to 52 older people and people living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 48 people living in the home.

Accommodation is provided on two floors. People have single bedrooms with en suite facilities of a toilet and sink. There are communal baths and showers. There are gardens and internal communal areas, including dining rooms and lounges, for people and their visitors. The home is located in a residential area on the outskirts of Peterborough.

The home had a registered manager in post at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At our focussed inspection on 26 August 2015 we found that the provider had followed their plan which they told us would be completed by 31 May 2015 and legal requirements had been met.

Action had been taken and all communal toilets and bathrooms now had paper towels available for people, their relatives and staff. Sluice rooms now had locks, sinks and paper towels for staff to use.

People were supported to take their prescribed medicines. Staff understood their responsibilities in the management and recording of medicines. Medication audits had taken place each month and actions had been taken as a result of any issues identified.

09 & 10 December 2014

During a routine inspection

Park House Nursing Home is registered to provide accommodation, nursing care and personal care for up to 52 older people and people living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 45 people living in the home.

This unannounced inspection took place on 9 & 19 December 2014. The previous inspection was in May 2013 and the provider was meeting the regulations that we assessed.

The home had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

There were poor arrangements for the management of medicines which meant that people were put at risk of not receiving their medicines as prescribed.

People were not protected against the risk of acquiring an infection because staff had not followed the Department of Health guidelines for the prevention and control of infection in care homes.

The risk of abuse for people was reduced because staff knew how to recognise and report abuse.

Staff understood the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and were aware of what they meant for people in the home. They followed guidance and submitted applications to the appropriate agencies. People who lacked capacity had best interest assessments completed.

Staff received a comprehensive induction and were supported in their roles through regular supervision, annual appraisals and training to ensure they understood their roles and responsibilities.

People’s health and care needs were assessed and reviewed so that staff knew how to care for and support people in the home. People had access to a wide variety of health professionals who were requested appropriately and who provided information and plans to maintain people’s health and wellbeing.

People and their relatives were confident raising any concerns or complaints with the management and that action would be taken. If people wanted, independent advocates could be sourced for them by the staff or management.

Staff supported people with activities that they enjoyed.

People in the home and their relatives were very happy with the staff and management. People were involved in meetings, and action was taken on requests or comments raised.

The provider had an effective quality assurance system in place which it used to help drive improvements to people’s care and the home they lived in.

We found two breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

9 May 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five members of staff, three people who used the service, one relative of a person who used the service and a stakeholder (by telephone).

Staff had access to detailed care records to ensure that they provided people with safe, appropriate, individual support and care. A person who used the service who we spoke with told us that the provider, "Looks after us extremely well." Another person we spoke with went on to tell us that Park House was, "Excellent. Its reputation preceded it. Support (from staff) is very good."

People were protected from the risk of infection spreading as there were effective systems in place to reduce the risk.

Effective staff training was in place to make sure that people who used the service received safe support and care from suitable, skilled, and knowledgeable staff.

We saw that an effective quality assurance system was in place as the provider used the results from surveys and audit to monitor, maintain and where appropriate improve the quality of the service delivered.

7 November 2012

During a routine inspection

People who used the service had the right level of information to make a decision about their support, care and treatments. Systems were in place to provide 'best interest' care where appropriate.

People's standard of health and welfare was maintained. Staff had access to detailed care records to ensure that they provided people with safe, appropriate, individual support and care. A person who we spoke with told us that they thought the home was, 'Excellent' and that they, 'Felt safe'.

People who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening.

There were effective recruitment and selection processes in place. A professional whom we spoke with confirmed that they had no concerns about staff.

There was an effective complaints system in place to ensure that people had no concern about raising a concern or complaint.