• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: ExtraCare Charitable Trust Willowbrook

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Glebe Close, Canley, Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 8DJ (024) 7669 4462

Provided and run by:
The ExtraCare Charitable Trust

All Inspections

8 February 2018

During a routine inspection

Willowbrook provides personal care and support to people who live in specialist ‘extra care’ housing. Extra care housing is purpose-built or adapted single household accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is rented, and is the occupant’s own home. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at the provision of the personal care service. Willowbrook has 61 properties. At the time of our visit there were 28 people receiving personal care support.

At the last inspection on 20 May 2015 the service was rated Good. At this inspection, we found the service remained ‘Good’.

The inspection took place on 8 and 9 February 2018 and was announced. We gave the provider 24 hours’ notice of our visit so they could arrange for people and staff to be available to talk with us about the service.

A registered manager was in post and was available to support this inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. However, the registered manager had not been working full time at the service for several months as they had been providing management support to another of the provider’s services. There were plans for them to continue to provide this support for a further short period of time. An acting manager had therefore been appointed to manage Willowbrook, on a temporary basis, until the registered manager returned.

People told us they felt safe with the staff who provided their care and said staff were respectful, caring and helpful. Staff understood their responsibilities to protect people from the risk of abuse and completed the necessary training so they had the knowledge and skills required to keep people safe.

There were enough staff to carry out the care calls and to meet people’s needs safely. The provider checked staff's suitability for their role before they started working at the service. Staff were motivated and worked as a team to deliver a person centred service. Staff knew people well and understood the importance of maintaining people’s preferred routines. People were provided with opportunities to participate in social activities and attend entertainment at the service to promote their wellbeing.

Risks to people's individual health and wellbeing were identified and care was planned to minimise these whilst continuing to promote people's independence. A wellbeing advisor supported people with their healthcare needs to help them maintain good health. They worked closely with a local GP to ensure when people’s health changed, they received the advice and treatment they required. Staff provided people with the necessary help and support to take their prescribed medicines.

People were supported to eat and drink enough to maintain a balanced diet that met their needs and preferences. People had the choice of eating in the restaurant within Willowbrook. Those people who needed assistance with their food and drinks had pre-arranged care calls so this could be provided.

Managers and staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA), and supported people in line with these principles. This included staff seeking consent from people before delivering care. Care plans and risk assessments contained relevant information for staff to assist them in providing the personalised care people required.

The provider had a clear management structure with effective systems and processes to oversee the quality of services and care provided. All staff spoken with told us of their commitment to provide people with a quality service. People told us they found staff approachable and responsive to their needs. There were regular ‘resident’ meetings where people could share their views and opinions about the quality of the service they received. There were also quality audit processes completed by management staff to ensure the service continued to meet people’s needs to the standards they expected.

Information about how to raise a complaint was available to people and people knew who to speak with if they had a concern. Complaints made had been appropriately acted upon and responded to.

20 May 2015

During a routine inspection

Willowbrook provides personal care and support to people who live in their own rented apartments located within the Willowbrook premises. At the time of our visit there were 34 people receiving personal care.

The inspection took place on 20 May 2015. We gave the provider 24 hour’s notice of our visit so that they could arrange for people and staff to be available to talk with us about the service.

A registered manager was in post. However, at the time of our visit, they were unavoidably absent from the service. The provider had taken interim action to appoint an acting manager to provide management support until the registered manager was able to return. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

When we last inspected the service on 25 June 2014 we identified some concerns about how people’s nutritional health was maintained and the completion of records. We asked the provider to take action in order to make improvements. The provider sent us an action plan which outlined the improvements they were going to make. At this inspection we found the required improvements had been made.

Where people were at risk of ill health due to not eating or drinking enough, care workers monitored people closely and reported any concerns to their manager. We saw professional advice was sought where concerns about people’s nutritional health were identified. People also had access to a ‘wellbeing nurse’ who provided a ‘drop in clinic’ at the service two mornings each week. The nurse supported people to maintain good health which included weight checks if required. The manager ensured risk assessments, were carried out for people at risk of ill health due to their health conditions. This included nutritional risk assessments and these were regularly reviewed to identify any changes in the support people may need. At the time of our visit there were no people identified to be at risk of poor nutrition. Care workers helped people to prepare meals or attend the restaurant where they were offered a choice of meals to ensure their nutritional needs were met.

People told us they felt safe at Willowbrook and staff were respectful, kind and helpful towards them. People felt staff were suitably trained to support them and their care needs were met. People were supported by a consistent group of care workers who had the necessary skills to provide the care and support they required.

People had an opportunity to say what social activities and entertainment they would like by attending resident meetings where these were discussed.

Managers and care staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA), and supported people in line with these principles. This included staff seeking consent from people before delivering care.

Care plans and risk assessments contained relevant information for staff to help them provide the personalised care people required. People were given opportunities to share their views and opinions about the quality of the service they received. People knew how to complain and information about making a complaint was available for people.

The provider and managers were committed to providing quality care to people. People who used the service felt they were listened to and found staff approachable and responsive. There were processes to monitor the quality of the service provided and understand the experiences of people. This was through regular communication with people and staff, checks on records, staff/resident meetings and a programme of checks and audits.

25 June 2014

During a routine inspection

When we visited Willowbrook there were 38 people who received care and support in their flats. Four of these people were in hospital. We spoke with six people and four staff about the care and services provided. We looked at four care files to see how people's needs were being met.

We looked at five outcomes to answer the following five questions. Is the service caring? Is the service responsive? Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service well led?

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our findings during the inspection, speaking with people using the service, the staff supporting them and from looking at records. If you wish to see the evidence supporting our summary please read the full report.

Is the service safe?

People we spoke with told us staff treated them with dignity and respect and they felt "safe".

Staff were required to read care plans to make sure they were fully aware of their roles and responsibilities in managing risks to keep people safe.

We saw risk assessments were in place for people but these had not been effectively followed for one person who lived at Willowbrook. We found records relating to this person's care had not been completed consistently to demonstrate their care needs were being met.

The service had effective recruitment and selection procedures in place and carried out relevant checks when they employed staff.

Is the service effective?

People were involved in the assessment of their health care needs and in making decisions about how their care and treatment was delivered.

We saw arrangements were in place to enable people to access a range of health professionals to meet their health and welfare needs.

Is the service caring?

During the inspection we observed staff providing support to people in the communal areas. They were caring and treated people in a respectful manner.

We spoke with two staff members who were knowledgeable of people's care needs and how they wished to be supported to enable their needs to be met.

People spoken with were satisfied with the quality of care they received and made positive comments about the staff. They told us, 'They look after us here brilliantly, they could not be better.' 'I like it here, it's very nice.' 'I am looked after well. I have never regretted it from day one.'

Is the service responsive?

We saw each person had been assessed to determine the level of support they needed from staff. Records showed when people's needs changed they were re-assessed so the level of support could be increased or decreased dependent on their needs. We saw one person's deteriorating health had not been responded to in a timely manner.

People told us if they had any concerns they would raise these with the manager. We saw a person raise a concern during our inspection. This was taken seriously and staff agreed to investigate.

Is the service well-led?

We saw there were systems in place to monitor the quality of care and services provided. This included regular meetings with people where they could discuss day to day issues linked to Willowbrook and the services provided.

6 November 2013

During a routine inspection

At the time of our visit Willowbrook were providing care and support to 38 people living in the flats. We spoke with three people and one visitor to the service. They were all positive in their comments about the care provided. They told us: 'We get the dentist, we get the doctor, we have the hairdresser, they are all here. What more could we ask for? It's wonderful, spot on I think.' 'I find it very, very good.'

We saw that people's nutritional needs were being met. People who lived at Willowbrook had a kitchen within their flats to prepare their own meals. Those people who were unable to prepare their own meals were provided with staff support during mealtimes through daily arranged visits.

People were positive about the staff supporting them. They told us: 'I find them pretty good, they all seem to get on well with me. They are smashing really.' 'They are wonderful, they have done all they can for me.'

We saw medicines were being managed appropriately. This included arranging reviews with the GP when people's health had deteriorated.

People we spoke with raised no complaints and told us if they did have a concern they would speak with the manager. We saw an appropriate system was in place for any complaints to be investigated.

13 February 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four out of 16 people living in the flats at Willowbrook. They were positive in their comments about the care and support they received. They told us: 'I would not like to go anywhere else. The carers look after me.' 'I am quite happy, really happy.'

We saw that people received varying levels of support depending on their needs. Some people had multiple visits each day as well as night checks. Others had agreed to call the office each day to let staff know they were alright. The support provided included help with personal hygiene, continence care, mobility, nutritional care, meal preparation and administration of medicine.

People told us they enjoyed the meals provided in the restaurant. Comments included: 'All the meals are nice.' 'The food is very good.' We saw that people had access to a range of social activities and outings which people told us they enjoyed.

People were positive in their comments about the staff supporting them. They told us: 'All the girls are kind and friendly. I get on well with them all.' 'They all do their job well but some are better than others.'

We saw that people were able to attend regular meetings where they could make suggestions or comment on any concerns relating to the service.